Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Darden Restaurants Inc.
Summary: According to a press release dated March 13, 2008, the complaint charges Darden and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Darden, through its subsidiaries, engages in the ownership and operation of casual dining restaurants in the United States and Canada. The Company operates restaurants under the names Red Lobster, Olive Garden, Bahama Breeze, Smokey Bones, and Seasons 52.

According to the complaint, during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements that misrepresented and failed to disclose: (a) that the Company’s core restaurants, such as Olive Garden, Red Lobster and LongHorn, were underperforming and same-store sales were experiencing negative trends; (b) that the Company was experiencing rising food costs which were above internal expectations; and (c) that, as a result of the forgoing, the defendants had no reasonable basis for their positive statements about the Company’s prospects and guidance for fiscal 2008.

On December 18, 2007, Darden announced its financial results for the fiscal second quarter of 2008, the period ended November 25, 2007. For the quarter, the Company reported net earnings from continuing operations of $44.1 million, or $0.30 per diluted share, and sales of $1.52 billion. Moreover, the Company dramatically reduced its diluted net earnings per share growth for fiscal 2008 from 10-12% to 7-9%. Upon this news, shares of the Company’s stock fell $7.68 per share, or over 21%, to close at $28.39 per share, on extremely heavy trading volume.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 5812
Sector: Services
Industry: Restaurants


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Darden Restaurants Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: DRI
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.darden.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 51 Pension Fund, et al. v. Darden Restaurants Inc., et al.
 COURT: M.D. Florida  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-00388
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Patricia C. Fawsett
 DATE FILED: 3/13/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 6/19/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 12/18/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Florida)
      197 S. Federal Highway, Suite 20, Boca Raton, FL, 33432
       (voice) 561-750-3000, (fax) 561-750-3364, info@csgrr.com/
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@csgrr.com/
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/13/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Robert Kalkstein, et al. v. Darden Restaurants Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/4/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top