Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Comcast Corporation
Summary: According to a press release dated January 03, 2008, the complaint charges Comcast and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Comcast, together with its subsidiaries, operates as a cable operator in the United States.

The complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, defendants materially misled the investing public, thereby inflating the price of Comcast’s common stock by publicly issuing false and misleading statements and failing to disclose: (i) that the Company was experiencing increased competition from satellite providers and telephone companies which was forcing it to spend more to attract and retain customers, and that this adverse trend was worsening; (ii) that the Company’s level of capital expenditures necessary to upgrade and maintain its technology and equipment was rising beyond internal expectations; and (iii) as a result of the foregoing, defendants’ positive statements about the Company and their earnings guidance were lacking in a reasonable basis at all times.

On October 25, 2007, Comcast issued a press release announcing its financial results for the third quarter of 2007, the period ended September 30, 2007. The Company reported that third-quarter net income fell 54% from the prior year and that it was experiencing slowing subscriber growth. Upon these announcements, the price of Comcast common stock fell $2.57 per share, or approximately 11%, to close at $21.28 per share, on heavy trading volume.

Then, on December 4, 2007, after the markets closed, the Company issued a press release announcing that it was cutting its 2007 user growth forecast of 6.5 million revenue generating units ("RGUs") to 6 million RGUs and that its revenue and cash flow growth projections would fall short of expectations. Upon this news, the price of Comcast common stock fell an additional $2.55 per share, or approximately 12%, to close at $18.18 per share, on heavy trading volume.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 4841
Sector: Services
Industry: Broadcasting & Cable TV


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Comcast Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: CMCSA
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.comcast.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Marilyn Clark, et al. v. Comcast Corporation, et al.
 COURT: E.D. Pennsylvania  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-00052
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Harvey Bartle, III
 DATE FILED: 01/03/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 02/01/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 12/04/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173,
  • Law Offices of Bernard M. Gross
      1515 Locust Street, 2nd Floor, Philadelphia, PA, 19102
       (voice) 215-561-3600, (fax) 215-561-3000, bmgross@bernardmgross.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/03/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top