Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Camtek Ltd.
Summary: According to a press release dated March 10, 2003, the Complaint charges Camtek and certain of the Company's executive officers with violations of federal securities laws. Among other things, plaintiff claims that defendants' material omissions and dissemination of materially false and misleading statements concerning Camtek's business and prospects caused the Company's stock price to become artificially inflated, inflicting damages on investors. Camtek Ltd. engages in the design, development, manufacture and marketing of automated optical inspection systems and related products which are utilized in the printed circuit board (``PCB'') and semiconductor industries to optically inspect various types of electronic product components for manufacturing defects.

The Complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants artificially inflated the price of Camtek shares by issuing statements touting positive trends in the PCB and semiconductors markets and the strength of Camtek's business and financial performance, but that defendants: (i) knew or recklessly disregarded and failed to disclose to the investing public that the Company lacked requisite internal controls, and (ii) misrepresented the Company's business and future prospects. Thus, the Company had no reasonable basis to make projections about its financial results, and as a result, defendants' Class Period statements concerning the Company's business and future prospects were, at minimum, reckless. The Complaint further alleges that defendants were further motivated to engage in this course of conduct in order to generate proceeds from a private placement with institutional investors in April 2006 whereby the Company garnered approximately $15 million in proceeds.

On December 21, 2006, Camtek issued a press release announcing The Company's preliminary financial results for fourth quarter 2006. The Company announced that fourth quarter revenue and earnings were expected to be lower than anticipated ``due to lower revenues in the semiconductor segment.'' This news shocked the market, causing shares of Camtek to plummet $1.28 per share -- a more than 22% drop from the previous day's closing price of $5.77 per share -- to close on December 21, 2006, at $4.49 per share on unusually heavy volume of more than 1.4 million shares traded.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3827
Sector: Technology
Industry: Scientific & Technical Instr.


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Camtek Ltd.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: CAMT
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.camtek.co.il

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Yuval Lapiner, et al. v. Camtek Ltd., et al.
 COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-01327
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
 DATE FILED: 3/7/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 11/22/2005  CLASS PERIOD END: 12/20/2006
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP (LA)
      1801 Ave. of the Stars, Suite 311, Los Angeles, CA, 90067
       (voice) (310) 201-915, (fax) (310) 201-916, info@glancylaw.com
  • Law Office of Jacob Sabo
      The Tower No. 3 Daniel Frisch Street, Tel Aviv, Israel, , 64731
       (voice) 011 972 3 607 88 88, (fax) 011 972 3 607 88 89, sabolaw@inter.net.il
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/07/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top