Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Michael Baker Corporation
Summary: According to a press release dated March 13, 2008, the Complaint charges that MBC and certain of its officers and directors violated federal securities laws. Specifically, the Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made false and misleading statements inflating reported revenue from the Company's energy business segment.

After the close of the market on February 22, 2008, the Company announced that it would be filing a restatement of its first, second and third quarter 2007 financial statements to correct errors in MBC's revenue recognition practices in the energy business segment. The Company's February 22, 2008 disclosure revealed, inter alia, that the amount of the restatement might exceed the total earnings reported for the energy business segment for the first nine months of the 2007 fiscal year -- the business segment that accounted for almost 70 percent of the Company's total earnings for that period. Furthermore, the February 22, 2008 announcement disclosed that the Company was still evaluating whether it would need to restate earnings for fiscal year 2006 financial statements.

Following the issuance of the Company's February 22, 2008 press release, the price of the Company's common stock dropped from a closing price of $36.10 on February 22, 2008 to a closing price of $27.57 at the end of the next trading day.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 8741
Sector: Services
Industry: Business Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Michael Baker Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: BKR
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.mbakercorp.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Robert T. Booth, et al. v. Michael Baker Corporation, et al.
 COURT: W.D. Pennsylvania  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-00370
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Joy Flowers Conti
 DATE FILED: 3/13/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 3/19/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 2/22/2008
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Law Offices of Alfred G. Yates
      519 Alleghany Bldg., 429 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15219
       (voice) 412.391.5164, (fax) ,
  • Schatz Nobel Izard P.C.
      One Corporate Center, 20 Church Street , Hartford, CT,
       (voice) 860.493.6292, (fax) 860.493.6290, info@snlaw.net
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 3/13/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Randall Mewes, et al. v. Michael Baker Corporation, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/18/2008
    Complaint - Class Action for Violation of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Richard Clayton, et al. v. Michael Baker Corporation, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 3/31/2008
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Unknown Plaintiff, et al. v. Michael Baker Corporation, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/10/2008
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Stephen P. Charlton, et al. v. Michael Baker Corporation, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/10/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top