Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


American Dental Partners, Inc.
Summary: According to a press release dated January 29, 2008, ADPI is a leading provider of business services to multidisciplinary dental group practices in selected markets throughout the United States. Park Dental Group ("PDG") located in Minneapolis-St. Paul area, was one of the dental groups who had a long-term contract agreement with ADPI, and provided ADPI with significant revenue. Indeed, PDG accounted for 29 percent of ADPI's consolidated net revenue in 2006.

The business relationship between ADPI and PDG worked well for a number of years, but disputes arose in 2004. In February 2006, PDG sued ADPI and its subsidiary. On December 12, 2007, in connection with the lawsuit a jury found ADPI and/or its subsidiary liable for breach of contract, breach of implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, breach of fiduciary duty, and tortious interference with contract and prospective advantage. The jury awarded PDG $88 million to compensate it for the injuries caused it by ADPI and its subsidiary and punitive damages of $42 million.

After the announcement of the jury verdict, ADPI's stock plummeted from $19.70 a share on December 11, 2007 to $14.34 on December 12, 2007, to $4.62 on December 13, 2007 after the announcement of the punitive damage award.

Specifically, the complaint charges ADPI and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market during the Class Period thereby artificially inflating the price of ADPI shares. More specifically, the complaint alleges that ADPI financial statements throughout the Class Period were materially false and misleading because defendants knew that a substantial amount of ADPI's revenue and earnings were obtained by conduct, which was wrongful and tortuous as, found by a jury on December 12, 2007.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 8090
Sector: Services
Industry: Business Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: American Dental Partners, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: ADPI
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.amdpi.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Michael Oliphant, et al. v. American Dental Partners, Inc., et al.
 COURT: D. Massachusetts  DOCKET NUMBER: 08-CV-10119
 JUDGE NAME: 
 DATE FILED: 01/25/2008  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 08/10/2005  CLASS PERIOD END: 12/13/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Abbey Spanier Rodd Abrams & Paradis, LLP
      212 East 39th Street, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212-889-3700, (fax) 212-684-519, info@abbeyspanier.com
  • Gilman & Pastor
      Stonehill Corporate Center 999 Broadway Suite 500, Saugus, MA, 01906
       (voice) 781.231.7850, (fax) 781.231.7840,
  • Law Office of Peter A. Lagorio
      63 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA, 02110
       (voice) 617-367-4200, (fax) 617-227-3384, plagorio@conversent.net
  • Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein LLP
      Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, Suite 3000, San Francisco, CA, 94111-3339
       (voice) 415.956.1000, (fax) 415.956.1008,
  • Paskowitz & Associates
      60 East 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, NY, 10165
       (voice) 212.685.0969, (fax) 212.685.2306, classattorney@aol.com
  • Roy Jacobs & Associates
      350 Fifth Avenue Suite 3000 , New York, NY, 10118
       (voice) , (fax) , classattorney@pipeline.com
  • Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP
       280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA, 19087
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbtklaw.com
  • Shapiro Haber & Urmy LLP
      75 State Street, Boston, MA, 02109
       (voice) 617.439.3939, (fax) 617.439.0134, info@shulaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  8

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/25/2008

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: W.K. Downey, et al. v. American Dental Partners, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/04/2008
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Frederick J. Johnston, et al. v. American Dental Partners, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/12/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top