Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Morgan Asset Management, Inc. : Regions Morgan Keegan Select Funds
Summary: According to a press release dated December 6, 2007, a class action lawsuit has been filed against Morgan Asset Management, Inc., Morgan Keegan & Company, Inc., MK Holding, Inc., Regions Financial Corporation (NYSE:RF), PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, and certain individuals, officers and directors associated with the above entities on behalf of investors who purchased shares of the Regions Morgan Keegan Select Intermediate Bond Fund ("MKIBX") and Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund ("RHIIX.

Specifically, the Complaint alleges that Funds and the defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose material facts relating to (i) the nature of the risk being assumed by an investment in the Funds, (ii) the illiquidity of certain securities in which the Funds invested, (iii) the extent to which the Funds' portfolios contained securities that were illiquid or exhibited the characteristics of illiquid securities so that they were highly vulnerable to suddenly becoming unsalable at the prices at which they were being carried on the Funds' records, (iv) the extent to which the Funds' portfolios were subject to fair value procedures, (v) the extent to which the values of such securities, and, consequently, the net asset values of the Funds, were based on estimates of value and the uncertainty inherent in such estimated values, and (vi) the concentration of investments in a single industry in excess of investment restrictions to which the Funds were subject.

The complaint further alleges that as of November 23, 2007, Morningstar reported RHIIX's NAV was down almost 55% year-to-date; from December 31, 2006 until November 30, 2007, the RHIIX's NAV per share declined from $10.14 to $3.91 for a loss of $6.23 per share, or 61.4%. For the same period, Morningstar reported MKIBX's NAV was down over 43%; MKIBX's NAV per share declined from $9.93 to $5.07 for a loss of $4.86 per share or 48.9%. The Complaint alleges that these extraordinary losses in share value were caused by the Funds' heavy investment in relatively new types of manufactured or structured fixed income securities that had not been tested through market cycles and by the failure of the Funds to have previously complied with required and disclosed procedures relating to the manner in which the Funds' assets were invested, the liquidity of their assets would be maintained, the lack of liquidity in the Funds' portfolios, the valuation procedures used to price their assets, the uncertainty inherent in the estimated value of their assets, violations of the Funds' investment restrictions on illiquid securities and investments in a single industry, and/or the failure to disclose such breaches and failures and conditions in the Funds' portfolios that rendered them extraordinarily vulnerable to changes in market conditions, far more vulnerable than other intermediate bond and high income funds affected by the same events and conditions in the subprime and other markets in 2007.

The Funds revealed, for the first time, on October 3, 2007 that, as of June 30, 2006, and June 30, 2007, the magnitude of the Funds' securities that were fair valued and were, therefore, illiquid securities. For MKIBX, it was disclosed that 55.8% of its investment securities were fair valued at June 30, 2006, and 50.4% at June 30, 2007. For RHIIX, it was disclosed that 49.5% of its investment securities were fair valued at June 30, 2006, and 59.7% at June 30, 2007.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code:
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Morgan Asset Management, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:
COMPANY WEBSITE: www.morgankeegan.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Richard A. Atkinson, M.D., et al. v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al.
 COURT: W.D. Tennessee  DOCKET NUMBER: 07-CV-02784
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Diane K. Vescovo
 DATE FILED: 12/6/2007  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 12/6/2004  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/3/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, PLC
      6000 Poplar Avenue, Suite 400, Memphis, TN, 38119-3972
       (voice) 901.260.5133, (fax) 901.435.5133, bwiddop@appersoncrump.com
  • Bramlett Law Offices
      2828 Stouffer Tower, P.O. Box 150734, Nashville, TN, 37215-0734fer
       (voice) 615.248.2828, (fax) ,
  • Chitwood Harley Harnes LLP
      2300 Promenade II; 1230 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA, 30309
       (voice) 888.873.3999, (fax) 404.876.4476, info@chitwoodlaw.com
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
      655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 619.231.1058, (fax) 619.231.7423, info@csgrr.com/
  • Falls & Veach, P.L.C.
      3422 Woodmont Boulevard, Nashville, TN, 37215
       (voice) 615.242.1800, (fax) ,
  • Head, Seifert & Vander Weide
      333 South Seventh Street, Suite 1140, Minneapolis, MN, 55402
       (voice) 612-339-1601, (fax) ,
  • Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen P.L.L.P.
      Suite 301, 660 Pennsylvania Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC, 20003-4335
       (voice) 202.544.9840, (fax) 202.544.9850,
  • Schatz Nobel Izard P.C.
      One Corporate Center, 20 Church Street , Hartford, CT,
       (voice) 860.493.6292, (fax) 860.493.6290, info@snlaw.net
  • Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP
       280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA, 19087
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbtklaw.com
  • Zimmerman Reed, PLLP
      651 Nicollet Mall, Suite 501, Minneapolis, MN, 55402
       (voice) 612.341.0400 , (fax) 612.341.0844, info@zimmreed.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  10

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint (Class Action) - Jury Trial Demanded
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 12/06/2007
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 12/07/2007

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Case Name and/or Number: Elizabeth P. Willis, et al. v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 12/21/2007
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Case Name and/or Number: Hartman, et al. v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/04/2008
    Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Terry Hamby, et al. v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 3/31/2008
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Case Name and/or Number: William J. DeJoseph, et al. v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 4/4/2008

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top