Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Summary: According to a law firm press release, on November 21, 2007 a class action was commenced on behalf of purchasers of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation common stock during the class period.

The complaint charges Freddie Mac and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Freddie Mac is a shareholder-owned company established by Congress in 1970 to support homeownership and rental housing.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements concerning Freddie Mac’s business, its risk management and the procedures it put in place to protect the Company from problems in the mortgage industry. In fact, during the Class Period, Freddie Mac was not adequately implementing risk control measures. Moreover, the Company’s procedures for appraisals led to many inflated appraisals, increasing the risk of defaults. Ultimately, the Company reported billions of dollars in losses, has been mentioned in investigations by the New York Attorney General and announced it must raise new capital to meet regulatory requirements. On this news, Freddie Mac stock fell over $10 per share to close at $26.74 on November 20, 2007.

According to the complaint, during the Class Period, defendants concealed the following information, which caused their statements to be materially false and misleading: (a) defendants were not implementing sufficient risk management controls to protect the Company from acquiring billions of dollars worth of mortgages with poor underwriting standards, causing the Company to have an untenable amount of risky loans; (b) defendants were not implementing controls to ensure that appraisals were done appropriately and to prevent collusion between lenders and appraisers, increasing the risk of defaults; (c) the Company was not adequately reserving for uncollectible loans, causing its financial results to be misleading; and (d) the Company had billions of dollars of bad loans which it would eventually have to write off, causing losses and capital deficiencies.

A similar, purported class action complaint has also been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6111
Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: FRE
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.freddiemac.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Scott Reimer, et al. v. Federal Home Mortgage Corproation, et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 07-CV-10526
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. John F. Keenan
 DATE FILED: 11/21/2007  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 08/01/2006  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/19/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Chitwood Harley Harnes LLP
      2300 Promenade II; 1230 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, GA, 30309
       (voice) (888) 873-3999, (fax) (404) 876-4476, attorney@chitwoodlaw.com
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      200 Broadhollow, Suite 406, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@lerachlaw.com
  • Waite Schneider Bayless & Chesley Co. LPA
      1513 Fourth & Vine Tower, One West Fourth Street, Cincinnati, OH, 45202
       (voice) 513.621.026, (fax) 513.381.2375, wsbclaw@aol.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/21/2007

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top