Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Focus Media Holding, Ltd.
Summary: According to a law firm press release dated November 26, 2007, a class action has been commenced on behalf of purchasers of the American Depositary Shares of Focus Media Holding Limited in the Company’s secondary public offering on or about November 7, 2007.

The complaint charges Focus Media and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Exchange Act of 1933. Focus Media operates out-of-home advertising network using audiovisual television displays in the People’s Republic of China.

According to the complaint, on or about November 1, 2007, Focus Media filed a Form F-1/A Registration Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the Secondary Offering. On or about November 6, 2007, the Prospectus with respect to the Secondary Offering, which forms part of the Registration Statement, became effective and more than 13.5 million shares of Focus Media’s ADSs at $64.75 per ADS were sold to the public, thereby raising more than $888 million.

The complaint alleges that the Registration Statement and the Prospectus contained inaccurate statements of material fact because they failed to disclose that the Company had made numerous acquisitions in its Internet advertising business division which were depressing its gross margins in that important division. On November 19, 2007, after the close of the market, Focus Media issued a press release announcing its financial results for the third quarter of 2007, the period ending September 30, 2007. Among other things, the Company reported that its gross margins for the third quarter of 2007 had declined due to several recent acquisitions. Following the Company’s earnings release, on November 20, 2007, the price of Focus Media ADSs dropped from $57.15 per ADS to $52.00 per ADS on extremely heavy trading volume.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7311
Sector: Services
Industry: Advertising


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Focus Media Holding, Ltd.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: FMCN
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.focusmedia.com.cn/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Eastriver Partners, Inc., et al. v. Focus Media Holding, Ltd., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 07-CV-10617
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Shirley Wohl Kram
 DATE FILED: 11/27/2007  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 11/07/2007  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/07/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Brodsky & Smith, LLC
      11 Bala Avenue, Suite 39, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.668.7987., (fax) 610.660.0450, esmith@Brodsky-Smith.com
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      200 Broadhollow, Suite 406, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@lerachlaw.com
  • Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP
       280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA, 19087
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbtklaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint For Violations Of Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/27/2007

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Scott Bauer, et al. v. Focus Media Holding, Ltd., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 12/21/2007

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top