Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


China Expert Technology, Inc.
Summary: According to a law firm press release, on November 21, 2007 a class action lawsuit was filed charging China Expert Technology, Inc. with violations of the federal securities laws. The Complaint alleges that the company knowingly issued materially false financial statements and other misleading statements concerning its business. During the Class Period, CXTI issued materially false and misleading statements and omitted to state material facts that rendered their affirmative statements misleading as they related to the Company’s financial performance, business prospects, and financial condition. As a result of these materially false and misleading statements, the price of the Company’s securities was artificially inflated to a Class Period high of over $8.00 per share. As the truth of the Company’s materially false and misleading statements entered the market, the Company’s stock plummeted to pennies and was even halted by the SEC.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 8742
Sector: Services
Industry:


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: China Expert Technology, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: CXTI
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://tech.chinaexpertnet.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
[Unknown Plaintiff], et al. v. China Expert Technology, Inc., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 
 JUDGE NAME: 
 DATE FILED: 11/21/2007  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 11/14/2006  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/01/2007
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. P.C. (Former Address)
      232 Madison Avenue, Suite 906, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.686.1060, (fax) 212.202.3827, info@rosenlegal.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/21/2007

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top