Countrywide Financial Corporation - Securities Class Action

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Litigation Activity Indices

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Countrywide Financial Corporation Summary: The original complaint alleges that defendants made false and misleading statements and material omissions regarding the Company's business and operations and that, as a result, the price of the Company's securities was inflated during the Class Period, thereby harming investors.

Specifically, according to the complaint, during the Class Period, defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the changing quality of the Company's mortgage loan portfolio. As late as April of 2007, the Company stated that credit rating agency Moody's upgraded the rating of the Company's banking segment and announced that its home loans segment was also under review for possible upgrade. Then, on June 12, 2007, the Company boasted of its position as the number one mortgage originator in the United States. These reassuring announcements served to conceal the alarming growth of loan delinquencies and the increasing likelihood of impairment charges, with resulting adverse impacts on the quality of the Company's collateralized debt obligations (CDO's), earnings and profits.

The complaint further alleges that on July 24, 2007, the Company finally announced the shocking news, of over $417 million in impairment charges and implementation of a $292.9 million loan loss provision. On the news, the price of Countrywide Financial stock tumbled 10.4%, closing at $30.50 per share. Following this, on August 9, 2007, within four days of reassuring statements that purported the reliability and availability of liquidity to meet short-term needs, the Company adopted a new risk disclosure, warning of short-term liquidity issues. As a result, on that day, the price of Countrywide Financial stock fell again, losing $1.00 or 3.4%, to close at $27.86 per share, on heavy volume of over 48.6 million shares.

According to a press release dated December 3, 2007, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and New York City Comptroller William Thompson were named the lead plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit against Countrywide Financial, the largest U.S. mortgage lender. The comptrollers have chosen the law firm Labaton Sucharow LLP to represent the plaintiffs.

On April 11, 2008, Lead Plaintiff filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Defendants filed numerous and separate motions for dismissal on June 10. The judge granted in part, denied in part the pending motions on December 1, providing plaintiffs 20 days to file an amended complaint.

A Second Consolidated Amended Complaint was filed January 7, 2009 addressing previous deficiencies in the complaint. On April 6, 2009, an order was granted dismissing the insider trading allegations against certain individual defendants whose trading plans were in order. However, the judge refused to dismiss the insider trading allegations against Countrywide CEO.

On August 29, 2009, the plaintiff filed a motion to certify the class. On September 23, 2009, Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer dismissed with prejudice all claims against Grant Thornton LLP.

On December 9, 2009, Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer signed the Memorandum of Decision Resolving All Class Certification Issues and Related Objections. According to the Memorandum, the class certification motion 509 is granted in part. This Order certifies three subclasses. It declines to include several debt securities and one hybrid security. this order also resolves some evidentiary objections related to the class certification proceedings. KPMG's evidentiary objections to the Marotto declaration is sustained 559. All KPMG's other evidentiary objections are overruled 577. All issues except damages and, to the extent necessary, '33 Act tracing, shall be determined on a class-wide basis. Labaton Sucharow LLP is appointed class counsel. State Fund is appointed class representative for the common stock subclass. The City Funds group is appointed class representative for the debt subclass. Barry Bahn is appointed class representative for the Capital Securities subclass. The parties shall jointly file a proposed class certification order and a proposed class notice on or before 1/5/2010.

On January 25, 2010, the Court entered the Order signed by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer granting in part and denying in part the plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. Specifically, the Court appoints the State Fund as Class Representative for the Common Stock Subclass, appoints the City Funds as Class Representative for the Debt Securities Subclass, and appoints Brahn as Class Representative for the Capital Securities Subclass. The Court appoints the law firm of Labaton Sucharow LLP as Class Counsel.

On March 26, 2010, the defendants filed several motions for summary judgment. On March 31, 2010, mediation proceedings began before Judge A. Howard Matz. On April 1, 2010, a Stipulation for Order Dismissing with Prejudice Securities Act Claims Against Defendant David Sambol was filed.

According to an article dated April 23, 2010, Countrywide Financial has reached an agreement to pay $600 million to settle the securities class action pending against the company and certain of its directors and officers… The settlement reportedly is still confidential and is also subject to the approval of several pension boards. The settlement agreement would include the release several top Countrywide executives, including [Countrywide’s] former CEO. The settlement is also subject to court approval; however, the agreement reportedly was the product of mediation before U.S. District Judge Harold Matz, and accordingly it seems unlikely that it would be set aside by the court, assuming it ultimately is approved by all parties.

According to a press release dated May 7, 2010, the New York State Common Retirement Fund and the five New York City public pension funds have announced today a proposed settlement of the Countrywide Financial Corporation Securities Class Action for $624 million. Under the proposed settlement, Countrywide would separately pay plaintiffs $600 million and the accounting firm, KPMG would pay $24 million, making the combined recovery one of the largest securities fraud settlements in U.S. history. Labaton Sucharow LLP is lead counsel for the funds. … The proposed settlement is expected to go before U.S. District Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for preliminary approval, after which notice will be sent to all class members and then a final approval hearing will be scheduled, most likely in September, 2010.

On June 29, 2010, an Amended Stipulation of Settlement was filed. That day, a motion for preliminary approval of the proposed settlement was filed.

On August 2, 2010, Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer granted the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. A Fairness Hearing will be held on Monday, November 15, 2010 at 1:00 p.m. before the Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer in Courtroom 12 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, to determine, among other things, (a) whether the proposed Settlement of the Action on the terms and conditions provided in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and should be approved by the Court; (b) whether the proposed Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund is fair and reasonable and should be approved by the Court; (c) whether a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice substantially in the form of Exhibit B to the Settlement Agreement should be entered in this Action; and (d) to consider Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel's application for a Fee and Expense Award.

According to an article dated October 22, 2010, the lead plaintiffs firm that obtained a $624 million shareholder settlement against Countrywide Financial Corp. and KPMG LLP -- the largest recovery to date in a securities class action filed over the housing crisis -- is seeking more than $55 million in attorney fees and expenses. Labaton Sucharow, the New York firm hired by several New York pension funds on a contingency basis to pursue securities fraud claims against Countrywide and its senior managers, will argue for the fees during a Nov. 15 hearing. U.S. District Judge Mariana Pfaelzer in Los Angeles was expected to decide at that time whether to approve the settlement. Pfaelzer gave the settlement preliminary approval on Aug. 2, but questioned the hours billed and the number of associates and contract attorneys used by Labaton Sucharow.

On January 4, 2011, an Amended Stipulation of Settlement was filed. The settlement was preliminarily approved on January 7, 2011. The Fairness Hearing was set for February 25, 2011, at 1:00 PM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.

On March 10, 2011, the Court entered the orders approving the plan of allocation and awarding attorneys' fees and expenses. According to the Order, the Court hereby awards Lead Counsel attorneys' fees of $46,472,000, or approximately 7.73% of the anticipated Gross Settlement Fund, plus interest earned at the same rates earned by the Gross Settlement Fund. Such attorney's fees shall be paid to Lead Counsel from the Gross Settlement Fund. Additionally, the Court hereby awards Lead Counsel reimbursement of expenses in the amount of $8,080,517.87, plus interest on the amount of expenses actually paid by Plaintiffs' Counsel as of September 15,2010, i.e., $4,102,291.91, earned at the same rates earned by the Gross Settlement Fund. Such expenses shall be paid to Lead Counsel from the Gross Settlement Fund.

The Court also entered the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. According to the Order, this Court finds that the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement were entered into by the Parties at arm's-length and in good faith, and are fully and finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate as to, and in the best interests of, each of the Parties and the Class Members. The Parties and their counsel are hereby directed to implement and consummate the Settlement in accordance with its terms and conditions. The Action and all Settled Claims are dismissed with prejudice.

A Notice of Appeal was filed on March 4, 2011, in objection to the settlement.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6035
Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Countrywide Financial Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	CFC
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.countrywide.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

George Pappas, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al.

COURT: C.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 07-CV-05295
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Mariana R. Pfaelzer
DATE FILED: 08/14/2007	SOURCE: Notice of Filing
CLASS PERIOD START: 10/24/2006	CLASS PERIOD END: 08/09/2007
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Entwistle & Cappucci LLP 299 Park Avenue, 14th Floor, New York, NY, 10171 (voice) 212.894.7200, (fax) 212.894.7272, info@entwistle-law.com Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP 501 West Broadway, Suit 1250, San Diego, CA, 92101 (voice) 877.493.5366, (fax) 619.238.5425, Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (former New York, NY) 805 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10022 (voice) 212.687.1980, (fax) 212.687.7714, info@kaplanfox.com Labaton Sucharow & Rudoff LLP 100 Park Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, NY, 10017 (voice) 212.907.0700, (fax) 212.818.0477 , info@labaton.com Law Office of Peter A. Lagorio 63 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA, 02110 (voice) 617-367-4200, (fax) 617-227-3384, plagorio@conversent.net Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville) 58 South Service Road, Suite 200, Melville, NY, 11747 (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen P.L.L.P. Suite 301, 660 Pennsylvania Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC, 20003-4335 (voice) 202.544.9840, (fax) 202.544.9850, Schubert & Reed LLP Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1050, San Francisco, CA, 94111 (voice) 415.788.4220, (fax) 415.788.0161, mail@schubert-reed.com Scott & Scott LLC (Connecticut) P.O. Box 192, 108 Norwich Avenue, Colchester, CT, 06415 (voice) 860.537.5537, (fax) 860.537.4432, scottlaw@scott-scott.com Susman Godfrey L.L.P. (Houston) 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100, Houston, TX, 77002 (voice) 713.651.9366, (fax) , Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (New York) 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016 (voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 11

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Class Action Complaint for Violations of theFederal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 08/14/2007
Order Consolidating Cases and Appointing Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/28/2007
Order Granting Further Consolidation Of Securities Class Action Cases
Type: Order of Consolidation		Date on the document: 03/28/2008

REFERENCE COMPLAINT

George Pappas, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp, et al

COURT: C.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 07-CV-05295
JUDGE NAME:
DATE FILED: 01/07/2009	SOURCE: Docket
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/12/2004	CLASS PERIOD END: 03/07/2008
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Second Amended and Consolidated
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Labaton Sucharow LLP 140 Broadway, New York, NY, 10005 (voice) 212.907.0700, (fax) 212.818.0477, info@labaton.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1

DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 04/11/2008
Omnibus Order On The Defendants' Motions To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Complaint And All Pending Requests For Judicial Notice
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 12/01/2008
Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 01/07/2009
Omnibus Order on Motions Related to the Second Amended Complaint and the Unopposed Motion to Correct the Order of December 1, 2008
Type: Order		Date on the document: 04/06/2009
Memorandum Of Decision Resolving All Class Certification Issues And Related Objections
Type: Order		Date on the document: 12/09/2009
Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification And Directing Dissemination Of Notice To The Class
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/22/2010
[Proposed] Order Dismissing With Prejudice Securities Act Claims Against Defendant David Sambol
Type: Order		Date on the document: 04/01/2010
Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement
Type: Settlement		Date on the document: 06/04/2010
Amended Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement
Type: Settlement		Date on the document: 06/09/2010
Notice Of Pendency And Proposed Settlement Of Class Action And Fairness Hearing
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 08/02/2010
Order Granting Preliminary Approval To Settlement And Directing Dissemination Of Notice To The Class
Type: Order		Date on the document: 08/02/2010
Proof of Claim
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/02/2010
First Amendment To Amended Stipulation And Agreement Of Settlement
Type: Settlement		Date on the document: 01/04/2011
Order Granting Preliminary Approval To First Amendment To Settlement Agreement And Directing Dissemination Of Supplemental Notice To The Clas
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/07/2011
Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/04/2011
Order Approving Plan Of Allocation Of Net Settlement Fund As Modified
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/04/2011
Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees And Expenses To Lead Counsel
Type: Order Approving AF&E		Date on the document: 03/04/2011
Notice Of Appeal To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Type: Notice of Appeal		Date on the document: 04/04/2011
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 08/19/2011

OTHER DOCUMENTS
Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
Case Name and/or Number: Joel Abrams, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 08/20/2007
Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
Case Name and/or Number: Norfolk County Retirement System, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 08/31/2007
Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
Case Name and/or Number: Jack McBride, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 09/19/2007
Complaint
Case Name and/or Number: Diana Wingard, et al. v. Countrywide Home Loans, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 10/09/2007
Shareholder Derivative Complaint - Demand for Jury Trial
Case Name and/or Number: Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, et al. v. Mozilo, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 10/24/2007
Securities Class Action Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
Case Name and/or Number: Barry Brahn, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 11/05/2007
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Case Name and/or Number: Marsha Steele, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al.
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 11/16/2007
Notice Of Removal
Case Name and/or Number: David H. Luther, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp, et al
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 12/14/2007
Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion For Remand To State Court And An Award Of Attorneys' Fees Expenses
Case Name and/or Number: David H. Luther, et al. v. Countrywide Financial Corporation, et al.
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/10/2008
Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Remand To State Court And Denying An Award Of Attorney's Fees And Expenses
Case Name and/or Number: David H. Luther, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp, et al
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/28/2008
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Case Name and/or Number: David H. Luther, et al. v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP, et al.
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 06/05/2008
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Case Name and/or Number: Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP, et al v. Countrywide Financial Corp, et al
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 07/11/2011

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�