 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Xinhua Finance Media Ltd. Summary: According to a press release dated May 22, 2007, the Complaint charges that Defendants Xinhua, certain officer of the Company, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., UBS AG, CIBC World Markets Corp., and WR Hambrecht & Co., LLC made, or facilitated, misleading statements in the Company's March 8, 2007 prospectus (the "Prospectus"), issued in connection with the offering of 23,076,932 ADSs, representing 46,153,846 common shares at $13 per share.
The Complaint alleges that the Prospectus failed to disclose material information that since April 2006, prior to the Company's IPO, Shelly Singhal, the Company's CFO at the time of the IPO, was simultaneously an investment banker and stockbroker in charge of Bedrock Securities ("Bedrock"). Since April 2006, prior to the Company's IPO, Bedrock had been under a Nasdaq cease-and-desist order for violating SEC regulations. Moreover, reports also surfaced that Singhal had been fighting a private civil racketeering lawsuit in California and had previously been a major investor in AremisSoft and ACLN, companies previously sued for fraud by the SEC. This information was never disclosed in the Prospectus.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 4899
Sector: Services
Industry: Broadcasting & Cable TV
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Xinhua Finance Media Ltd. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | XFML |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.xinhuafinancemedia.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Israel Bollag, et al. v. Xinhua Finance Media Ltd., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 05/22/2007 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 05/22/2007 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Joel Darras, et al. v. Xinhua Finance Media Ltd., et al. | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 05/29/2007 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top