Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Refco, Inc.
Summary: Several purported shareholder class action lawsuits have been filed against Refco and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Refco provides execution and clearing services for exchange traded derivatives; and brokerage services in the fixed income and foreign exchange markets in the United States, Bermuda, and the United Kingdom.

Refco went public via an initial public offering in August 2005. A mere three months later, on October 10, 2005, Refco announced that its Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chairman and controlling shareholder, was being placed on a leave of absence and that the Company had discovered, purportedly through an internal review, a receivable of $430 million owed by the CEO to the Company. The Company also announced that based on the undisclosed related party transaction, its prior financial statements should not be relied upon.

According to the complaint, on or about August 10, 2005, Refco filed with the SEC a Form S-1/A Registration Statement (the "Registration Statement"), for the IPO. On or about August 11, 2005, the Prospectus (the "Prospectus") with respect to the IPO, which forms part of the Registration Statement, became effective and 26.5 million of Refco's common stock were sold to the public, thereby raising approximately $583 million. According to the complaint, the Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO was materially false and misleading for several reasons. As detailed in the complaint, Refco has now admitted that those financial statements should no longer be relied upon and will likely be restated. This amounts to an admission that those financial statements were materially false and misleading when issued. In a section entitled "Certain Relationships And Related Transactions", the Prospectus purported to detail all of the related party transactions concerning its business. The Prospectus, however, failed to disclose the related-party loan of $430 million to an entity controlled by the CEO.

As a result of this news, the price of Refco common stock declined precipitously falling from $28.56 per share to $15.60 per share on extremely heavy trading volume.

NOTE: Refco Inc. is a non-party that is not named in this lawsuit due to its filing for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on October 17, 2005.

On February 3, 2006, the Honorable Gerard Lynch appointed RH Capital Associates LLC ("RH Capital") and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC ("PIMCO") as Co-Lead Plaintiffs and Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP and Grant & Eisenhofer, P.A. as Co-Lead Counsel for the Class in this securities fraud class action.

On April 3, 2006, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Class Action Complaint which named a number of additional defendants, including certain officers, directors and underwriters, and additional claims.

On May 5, 2006, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint, adding Defendant BAWAG P.S.K. Bank für Arbeit und Wirtschaft und Österreichische Postsparkasse Aktiengesellschaft.

On June 5, 2006, a Suggestion of Bankruptcy was filed as to Refco Managed Futures LLC, Westminster-Refco Management LLC, and Lind-Waldock Securities LLC.

In July 2006, the defendants filed several motions to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint.

On September 8, 2006, a motion for preliminary approval of a partial settlement with Defendant BAWAG was filed. On September 8, 2006, a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement was filed outlining the partial settlement in the amount of $108,000,000 (“Non-Contingent Payment”), plus additional payment up to $32,000,000 (“Contingent Payment”). On January 9, 2007, the motion for preliminary approval was denied. On February 22, 2007, a notice of settlement was filed and on March 5, 2007, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement with BAWAG.

On April 30, 2007, the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch issued an 87-page opinion in which the Court denied the vast majority of the ten motions to dismiss filed by a total of twenty-eight defendants. On May 31, 2007, Judge Lynch denied motions for reconsideration of that opinion.

On June 29, 2007, Judge Lynch approved the class action settlement with BAWAG.

On December 3, 2007, the Lead Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint adding Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown partner as named Defendants.

On December 7, 2007, a motion for preliminary approval of a partial settlement with Defendant Dennis Klejna was filed. According to the motion, the settlement includes the payment of $7,600,000 in cash. Defendant Klejna further agreed to provide access to document and financial information.

On December 20, 2007 and February 1, 2008, certain defendants filed motions to dismiss the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint.

On January 22, 2008, Judge Lynch preliminarily approved the settlement with Defendant Klejna.

On February 21, 2008, a motion for preliminary approval of a partial settlement with Defendant Joseph J. Murphy was filed. According to the motion, the settlement includes the payment of $7,900,000 in cash. The motion was granted on March 26, 2008.

On August 14, 2008, the motion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. to Dismiss Count Three of the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint against them was granted.

On October 27, 2008, a motion for preliminary approval of partial settlement with Defendant Sandler O’Neill Partners LP was filed. The settlement includes the payment of $3,500,000 in cash for the Settlement Class. The motion was granted on November 6, 2008.

On December 2, 2008, an Order was entered regarding the Lead Underwriter Defendants' motion to reconsider the Court's Order of November 6, 2008, granting preliminary approval of a partial settlement between Lead Plaintiffs and defendant Sandler O'Neill. According to the Order, the motion is granted, but upon reconsideration, the Court reaffirms and adheres to that Order.

On March 17, 2009, Judge Lynch signed the Opinion and Order. According to the Order, the Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint is dismissed in its entirety as to the Mayer Brown Defendants. On March 18, 2009, the Court entered the Clerk’s Judgment. On April 1, 2009, the lead plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On April 16, 2009, the lead plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal from the March 18th judgment.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6200
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Refco, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: RFX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.refco.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Joseph Mazur, et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 05-CV-8626
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Gerard E. Lynch
 DATE FILED: 10/11/2005  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 08/11/2005  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/07/2005
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (New York, One Pennsylvania Plaza)
      One Pennsylvania Plaza, Suite 1910, New York, NY, 10119
       (voice) 212.279.5050, (fax) 212.279.3655, JFruchter@FruchterTwersky.com
  • Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo (MA)
      One Liberty Square, Boston, MA, 2109
       (voice) 617.542.8300, (fax) 617.230.0903, info@bermanesq.com
  • Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz LLP (New York, NY)
      10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 800.217.1522, (fax) , info@bernlieb.com
  • Brodsky & Smith, LLC (former Pennysylvania)
      11 Bala Avenue, Suite 39, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.668.7987, (fax) 610.660.0450, esmith@Brodsky-Smith.com
  • Curtis V. Trinko LLP
      16 West 46th Street 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10036
       (voice) 212.490.9550, (fax) 212.986.0158, ctrinko@trinko.com
  • Dyer & Shuman, LLP
      801 East 17th Avenue, Denver, CO, 80218-1417
       (voice) 303.861.3003, (fax) 800.711.6483, info@dyershuman.com
  • Federman & Sherwood (Oklahoma City)
      120 North Robinson, Suite 2720, Oklahoma City, OK, 73102
       (voice) 405-235-1560, (fax) , wfederman@aol.com
  • Glancy Binkow & Goldberg LLP (Los Angeles)
      1801 Ave. of the Stars, Suite 311, Los Angeles, CA, 90067
       (voice) (310) 201-915, (fax) (310) 201-916, info@glancylaw.com
  • Grant & Eisenhofer (Wilmington)
      1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2100, Wilmington, DE, 19801
       (voice) 302.622.7000, (fax) 302.622.7100, lawyers@gelaw.com
  • Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A.
      World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Baltimore, MD, 21202
       (voice) 410.332.0030, (fax) , pivenlaw@erols.com
  • Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (Melville)
      200 Broadhollow, Suite 406, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, info@lerachlaw.com
  • Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
      655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 619.231.1058, (fax) 619.231.7423,
  • Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen P.L.L.P.
      Suite 301, 660 Pennsylvania Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC, 20003-4335
       (voice) 202.544.9840, (fax) 202.544.9850,
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP (New York)
      One Pennsylvania Plaza, 49th Floor, New York, NY, 10119
       (voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) 212.868.1229, info@milbergweiss.com
  • Paskowitz & Associates
      60 East 42nd Street, 46th Floor, New York, NY, 10165
       (voice) 212.685.0969, (fax) 212.685.2306, classattorney@aol.com
  • Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP (New York)
      100 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY, 10017-5516ven
       (voice) 212.661.1100, (fax) 212.661.8665, info@pomerantzlaw.com/
  • Sarraf Gentile LLP (former NY)
      485 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1005, New York, NY, 10018
       (voice) 212.868.3610, (fax) 212.918.7967,
  • Schatz & Nobel, P.C.
      330 Main Street, Hartford, CT, 06106
       (voice) 800.797.5499, (fax) 860.493.6290, sn06106@AOL.com
  • Schiffrin & Barroway LLP
      3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com
  • Scott & Scott LLC (Connecticut)
      P.O. Box 192, 108 Norwich Avenue, Colchester, CT, 06415
       (voice) 860.537.5537, (fax) 860.537.4432, scottlaw@scott-scott.com
  • Shalov Stone & Bonner LLP (New York)
      485 Seventh Avenue, Suite 1000, New York, NY, 10018
       (voice) 212.239.4340, (fax) 212.239.4310, lawyer@lawssb.com
  • Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
      6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
       (voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
  • Wechsler Harwood LLP
      488 Madison Avenue 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10022
       (voice) 212.935.7400, (fax) , info@whhf.com
  • Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (New York)
      270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com
  • Wolf Popper, LLP
      845 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022-6689Ave
       (voice) 877.370.7703, (fax) 212.486.2093, IRRep@wolfpopper.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  25

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/11/2005
    Order
    Type: Order of Consolidation Date on the document: 12/21/2005
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 02/08/2006
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/15/2006

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In Re: Refco, Inc. Securities Litigation
     COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 05-CV-8626
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Gerard E. Lynch
     DATE FILED: 12/03/2007  SOURCE: Docket
     CLASS PERIOD START: 07/01/2004  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/17/2005
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Second Amended and Consolidated
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (New York, NY)
      1285 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor, New York, NY, 10019
       (voice) 212.554.1400, (fax) 212.554.1444, blbg@blbglaw.com
  • Grant & Eisenhofer (New York)
      45 Rockefeller Center, 630 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10111
       (voice) 646.722.8500, (fax) 646.722.8500, lawyers@gelaw.com
  • Grant & Eisenhofer (Wilmington)
      1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2100, Wilmington, DE, 19801
       (voice) 302.622.7000, (fax) 302.622.7100, lawyers@gelaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/03/2006
    First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/05/2006
    Declaration Of James J. Sabella
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 05/17/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion To Modify The PSLRA Stay To Permit Limited Document Discovery
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 05/17/2006
    Declaration Of John P. Coffey In Further Support Of Lead Plaintiffs' Motion For A Limited Modification Of The PSLRA Stay Of Discovery
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 05/23/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum In Further Support Of Their Motion To Modify The PSLRA Stay To Permit Limited Document Discovery
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 06/13/2006
    Answer Of Defendant Phillip R. Bennett To First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/10/2006
    Answer Of Defendant Refco Group Holdings, Inc. To First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/10/2006
    Letter to the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/12/2006
    Answer And Affirmative Defenses Of Certain Underwriter Defendants To Lead Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/24/2006
    Opinion and Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 08/08/2006
    Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement
    Type: Settlement Date on the document: 09/07/2006
    Declaration Of Megan D. McIntyre In Support Of Lead Plaintiffs' Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Partial Settlement With Defendant BAWAG, (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement, (III) Preliminary Approval Of Form And Manner Of Notice, And Scheduling A Final Approval Hearing
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 09/08/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Partial Settlement With Defendant BAWAG, (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement, (III) Preliminary Approval Of Form And Manner Of Notice, And (IV) Scheduling A Final Approval Hearing
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 09/08/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs' Notice Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Partial Settlement With Defendant BAWAG, (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement, (III) Preliminary Approval Of Form And Manner Of Notice, And (IV) Scheduling Of A Final Approval Hearing
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 09/08/2006
    Stipulation And Agreement Of Settlement
    Type: Settlement Date on the document: 09/08/2006
    Declaration Of John P. Coffey In Support Of Lead Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendants' Motions To Dismiss The First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 09/14/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 09/15/2006
    Declaration Of John C. Browne In Support Of Lead Plaintiffs' Motion To Modify The PSLRA Discovery Stay For The Limited Purpose Of Service Of A Subpoena On Refco's Transfer Agent For Settlement Administration Purposes
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 09/27/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion To Modify The PSLRA Discovery Stay For The Limited Purpose Of Service Of A Subpoena On Refco’s Transfer Agent For Settlement Administration Purposes
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 09/27/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Motion To Modify The PSLRA Discovery Stay For The Limited Purpose Of Service Of A Subpoena On Refco’s Transfer Agent For Settlement Administration Purposes
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 09/27/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Reply To Grant Thornton LLP’s Response To Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion For Preliminary Approval Of The Proposed Settlement With BAWAG
    Type: Other Date on the document: 10/05/2006
    Letter to the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch
    Type: Other Date on the document: 11/28/2006
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Reply To The Underwriter Defendants’ And Grant Thornton LLP’s Objections To Lead Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion For Preliminary Approval Of The Proposed Settlement With BAWAG
    Type: Other Date on the document: 01/05/2007
    Opinion and Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 01/09/2007
    Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement
    Type: Settlement Date on the document: 02/13/2007
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Partial Settlement With Defendant BAWAG, (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement, (III) Preliminary Approval Of Form And Manner Of Notice, And (IV) Scheduling Of A Final Approval Hearing
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 02/22/2007
    Order Preliminarily Approving Proposed Settlement With Defendant BAWAG
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/05/2007
    Notice Of (I) Pendency And Proposed Partial Settlement Of Class Action With BAWAG, And (II) Hearing On Proposed Partial Settlement
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 03/26/2007
    Opinion and Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 04/30/2007
    Lead Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Defendant Silverman's Motion For Partial Reconsideration
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 05/24/2007
    Lead Plaintiffs' Opposition To The Audit Committee Defendants' Motion For Partial Reconsideration
    Type: Other Date on the document: 05/24/2007
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 05/31/2007
    Judgment Approving Class Action Settlement With Bawag
    Type: Other Date on the document: 06/29/2007
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 08/03/2007
    Class Action Complaint Against Mayer Brown LLP And Joseph P. Collins
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/01/2007
    Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 12/03/2007
    Lead Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Partial Settlement With Defendant Dennis A. Klejna, (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement, (III) Preliminary Approval Of Form And Manner Of Notice, And (IV) Scheduling A Final Approval Hearing
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 12/07/2007
    Lead Plaintiffs' Notice Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Partial Settlement With Defendant Dennis A Klejna, (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement, (III) Preliminary Approval Of Form And Manner Of Notice, And (IV) Scheduling Of A Final Approval Hearing
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 12/07/2007
    Letter to the Honorable Gerard E. Lynch
    Type: Other Date on the document: 12/07/2007
    Stipulation And Agreement Of Settlement Between Lead Plaintiffs And Defendant Dennis A. Klejna
    Type: Settlement Date on the document: 12/07/2007
    Lead Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Law In Response To Non-Settling Defendants' Opposition To Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Partial Settlement With Defendant Dennis A. Klejna, (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement, (III) Preliminary Approval Of Form And Manner Of Notice, And (IV) Scheduling A Final Approval Hearing
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 01/04/2008
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 01/22/2008
    Lead Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Settlement With Defendant Joseph J. Murphy
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 02/21/2008
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/26/2008
    Opinion And Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 08/14/2008
    Notice Of Appeal
    Type: Notice of Appeal Date on the document: 08/25/2008
    Declaration Of James J. Sabella In Support Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Settlement With Defendant Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P. And (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 10/27/2008
    Lead Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Settlement With Defendant Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. And (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 10/27/2008
    Lead Plaintiffs' Notice Of Motion For (I) Preliminary Approval Of Settlement With Defendant Sandler O'Neill Partners, L.P., And (II) Preliminary Certification Of Class For Purposes Of Settlement
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 10/27/2008
    Order Preliminarily Approving Proposed Settlement With Sandler O'Neill & Partners L.P.
    Type: Order Date on the document: 11/06/2008
    Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 12/02/2008
    Opinion And Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/17/2009
    Opinion And Order
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/17/2009
    Notice Of Appeal
    Type: Notice of Appeal Date on the document: 04/16/2009
    US District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 04/28/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws - Demand for Jury Trial
    Case Name and/or Number: Frontpoint Financial Services Fund, LP, et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/11/2005
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Jonathan Glaubach, et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/12/2005
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Sandra E. Weiss, et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/12/2005
    Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: United States Of America, et al. v. Phillip R. Bennett, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/12/2005
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: RD Partners LLC, et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/14/2005
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
    Case Name and/or Number: [Unknown plaintiff], et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/14/2005
    Refco, Inc. Voluntary Bankruptcy Petition
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type: Other Date on the document: 10/17/2005
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Bruce Nathanson, et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/19/2005
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
    Case Name and/or Number: Jacob Baker, et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/19/2005
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Todd Weiss et al. v. Refco, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/24/2005

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top