Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Investors Financial Services Corporation
Summary: The original Complaint alleges that Defendants caused IFIN shares to trade at artificially inflated levels through the issuance of false and misleading financial statements and guidance. The Company's statements served to convince investors that the Company's financial statements were accurate, including results for revenues, growth and interest income, and the Company had shrewdly built into its models and assumptions the impact of continued interest rate compression and flattening of the US interest rate yield curve.

In October 2004, the Company surprised the market when they finally revealed the need to restate financial results over a three-year period. On October 21, 2004, the price of IFIN stock plummeted, from its previous close of $43.70 to $36.50, on volume of over 11 million shares. Later, the Company revealed that during the period from 2001 to 2004, Investors had overstated net interest income by as much as $6.2 million.

The complaint further alleges that on or around July 14, 2005, IFIN dropped 15% after the financial back-office company slashed earnings guidance, citing interest rate pressure. Once again, the Company announced an unprecedented "reset" of their 2005 quarterly and 2005 yearly guidance. Defendants did this, allegedly, to bring their numbers in line with the "new" realities of market-driven rates and rate spreads. The Complaint alleges further that IFIN's assertions that an interest rate event peculiar to the second quarter served as the purported "trigger" for the Company's changed circumstances. This was false. In fact, the Complaint alleges, the change in the Company's fortunes was a direct result of the dramatic flattening of the yield curve and contraction of rate spreads. The Company cited a flatter-than-expected yield curve; narrower-than-expected reinvestment spreads; weaker-than-expected market-sensitive revenues, which included fees, linked to both the equity and foreign currency markets; and continued investments in headcount and technology to support new and existing clients.

On July 15, 2005, the price of IFIN shares plummeted from its previous close of $41.52 to $34.05 for a loss 17.9% percent of their value on unprecedented volume of over 22 million shares. The Class Period high was $53.44; it now trades under $35 per share.

Investors Financial Services Corp. ("IFIN") operates as a bank holding company for Investors Bank & Trust Company that provides asset managers with services including global custody, multi-currency accounting and mutual fund administration in the United States.

According to the Company’s FORM 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, the U.S. District Court has consolidated three purported class action complaints and appointed a lead plaintiff, who filed a consolidated complaint against the Company and seven of its current and former officers on February 3, 2006. Among other things, the consolidated complaint asserts that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the period April 10, 2001 until July 15, 2005. The allegations in the consolidated complaint predominantly relate to: (1) the Company’s October 2004 restatement of its financial results, and (2) the Company’s July 2005 revision of public guidance regarding its future financial performance. The consolidated complaint seeks unspecified damages, interest, fees, and costs. On May 14, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss all claims asserted in the consolidated complaint. That motion is currently pending before the Court.

On July 31, 2007, the Court entered the Order dismissing the complaint without prejudice. On October 30, 2007, the plaintiffs filed a First Amended Consolidated Complaint, and on January 11, 2008, the defendants responded by filing a motion to dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint.

According to the docket, the Magistrate Judge entered a Reports and Recommendation to the court stating the case should be dismissed with prejudice on January 13, 2009. On March 19, 2009 the judge entered a Final Order dismissing the case with prejudice and closing the docket.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6282
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Investors Financial Services Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: IFIN
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.investorsbnk.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
The Archdiocese of Milwaukee Support Fund, et al. v. Investors Financial Services Corporation, et al.
 COURT: D. Massachusetts  DOCKET NUMBER: 05-CV-11627
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay
 DATE FILED: 08/04/2005  SOURCE: Notice of Filing
 CLASS PERIOD START: 10/15/2003  CLASS PERIOD END: 07/15/2005
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Federman & Sherwood (Oklahoma City)
      120 North Robinson, Suite 2720, Oklahoma City, OK, 73102
       (voice) 405-235-1560, (fax) , wfederman@aol.com
  • Law Offices of Brian M. Felgoise, P.C.
      Esquire at 261 Old York Road, Suite 423, Jenkintown, PA, 19046
       (voice) 215.886.1900, (fax) , securitiesfraud@comcast.net
  • Schiffrin & Barroway LLP
      3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com
  • Scott & Scott LLC (Connecticut)
      P.O. Box 192, 108 Norwich Avenue, Colchester, CT, 06415
       (voice) 860.537.5537, (fax) 860.537.4432, scottlaw@scott-scott.com
  • Wechsler Harwood LLP
      488 Madison Avenue 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10022
       (voice) 212.935.7400, (fax) , info@whhf.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  5

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 08/04/2005
    Order Approving The City Of Deerfield Beach Non-Uniform Employees Retirement Plan And The Ironworkers St. Louis District Council Pension Fund's Motion For Consolidation, Appointment As Lead Plaintiffs And For Approval Of Selection Of Lead And Liaison Counsel
    Type: Order Date on the document: 11/02/2005

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    The Archdiocese of Milwaukee Support Fund, et al. v. Investors Financial Services Corporation, et al.
     COURT: D. Massachusetts  DOCKET NUMBER: 05-CV-11627
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Reginald C. Lindsay
     DATE FILED: 10/30/2007  SOURCE: Docket
     CLASS PERIOD START: 04/10/2001  CLASS PERIOD END: 07/15/2005
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Amended and Consolidated
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego)
      655 West Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 619.231.1058, (fax) 619.231.7423, info@csgrr.com/
  • Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Francisco)
      100 Pine Street, Suite 2600, San Francisco, CA, 94111
       (voice) 415.288.4545, (fax) 415.288.4534,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Lead Plaintiffs’ [Corrected] Consolidated Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/03/2006
    Report And Recommendation On Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Order Date on the document: 07/31/2007
    Lead Plaintiffs' First Amended Consolidated Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/30/2007
    Judgment Of Dismissal
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/19/2009
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 3/19/2009

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint - Jury Trial Demanded
    Case Name and/or Number: Robert Faussner, et al. v. Investors Financial Services Corp., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 08/12/2005

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top