Infineon Technologies AG - Securities Class Action

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Infineon Technologies AG Summary: The original complaint charges Infineon and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Infineon manufactures and markets a wide variety of polymer and specialty products.

Specifically, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued false and misleading statements about Infineon's business and prospects and concealed Infineon's involvement in price fixing activities. Specifically, the complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants concealed the following material adverse facts from the investing public: (a) from on or about July 1, 1999 until on or about June 15, 2002, Infineon and its co-conspirators entered into and engaged in a conspiracy in the United States and elsewhere to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the prices of Dynamic Random Access Memory ('DRAM') to be sold to certain original equipment manufacturers ('OEMs') of personal computers and servers; (b) the conspiracy consisted of a continuing agreement, understanding, and concert of action among Infineon and its co-conspirators, the substantial terms of which were to agree to fix the prices for DRAM to be sold to certain OEMs; and (c) for the purpose of forming and carrying out the conspiracy, Infineon and its co-conspirators: (i) participated in meetings, conversations, and communications in the United States and elsewhere to discuss the prices of DRAM to be sold to certain OEMs; (ii) agreed during those meetings, conversations, and communications to charge prices for DRAM at certain levels to be sold to certain OEMs; (iii) issued price quotations in accordance with the agreements reached; and (iv) exchanged information on sales of DRAM to certain OEM customers for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing adherence to the agreed-upon prices and artificially inflating the Company's revenue and profits. As a result, the Company's shares traded at inflated prices, enabling the Company to consummate a $5.5 billion IPO and a $1 billion bond offering, together with stock-for-stock acquisitions using the Company's inflated shares as currency.

On July 19, 2004, defendants acknowledged the seriousness of a Justice Department investigation into Infineon's price fixing practices when they announced they had recorded a $190 million charge for the antitrust investigation. Then, on September 15, 2004, the Associated Press issued an article which stated: 'German computer chipmaker Infineon Technologies AG has agreed to plead guilty to price fixing and will pay a $160 million fine.... In a plea agreement filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, Infineon acknowledged conspiring with other companies to fix prices of widely used computer memory products between July 1999 and June 2002.'

As summarized by the Company’s FORM 20-F for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, between September and November 2004, seven securities class action complaints were filed against the Company and current or former officers in U.S. federal district courts, later consolidated in the Northern District of California, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of the Company’s publicly-traded securities who purchased them during the period from March 2000 to July 2004 (the “Securities Class Actions”). The consolidated amended complaint alleges violations of the U.S. securities laws and asserts that the defendants made materially false and misleading public statements about the Company’s historical and projected financial results and competitive position because they did not disclose the Company’s alleged participation in DRAM price-fixing activities and that, by fixing the price of DRAM, defendants manipulated the price of the Company’s securities, thereby injuring its shareholders. The plaintiffs seek unspecified compensatory damages, interest, costs and attorneys’ fees.

In September 2006, the court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend. In October 2006, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. In March 2007, pursuant to a stipulation agreed with the defendants, the plaintiffs withdrew the second amended complaint and were granted a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint in July 2007. A hearing was held on November 19, 2007. On January 25, 2008, the court entered into an order granting in part and denying in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss the Securities Class Action complaint. The court denied the motion to dismiss with respect to plaintiffs’ claims under §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and dismissed the claim under § 20A of the act with prejudice. On August 13, 2008 the court denied a motion of the Company for summary judgment based on the statute of limitations. On August 25, 2008, the Company filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings against foreign purchasers, i.e., proposed class members who are neither residents nor citizens of the United States who bought securities of the Company on an exchange outside the United States. On August 25, 2008, the plaintiffs also filed a motion to certify the class.

On September 5, 2008, a notice was filed confirming the withdrawal of two lead plaintiffs. On November 10, 2008, a motion to intervene was filed naming an additional lead plaintiff. On March 6, 2009, the Court entered an Order by Judge James Ware denying the pending motion for judgment on the pleadings, granting the motion to certify the class, and granting the motion to intervene.

On May 13, 2009, Judge James Ware signed the Order staying the case. According to the Order, on May 5, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Defendant permission to undertake an interlocutory appeal of the Court’s March 6, 2009 Order granting class certification. (See Docket Item No. 291.) In light of this appeal, the parties have filed a stipulation agreeing to postpone development of a plan with respect to class notice. (Docket Item No. 292.) Given that resolution of issues surrounding the propriety of class treatment are central to this action, the Court finds that this case should be stayed pending resolution of Defendant’s appeal by the Ninth Circuit.

On September 14, 2010, the Court entered the Mandate from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The plaintiffs were given leave to file a Fourth Amended Class Action Complaint, which they did on November 8, 2010. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Fourth Amended Complaint on December 10, 2010. The motion was granted in part and denied in part on March 17, 2011.

On June 20, 2011, a Stipulation of Settlement was filed. The proposed settlement is in the amount of $6.2 million in cash. On November 2, 2011, Judge James Ware granted the motion for settlement, motion for attorneys' fees and expenses, and approved the plan of allocation. The action is now dismissed with prejudice.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3674
Sector: Technology
Industry: Semiconductors

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Infineon Technologies AG
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	IFX
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.infineon.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

James Dolan, et al. v. Infineon Technologies AG, et al.

COURT: N.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 04-CV-04156
JUDGE NAME: Hon. James Ware
DATE FILED: 09/30/2004	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/13/2000	CLASS PERIOD END: 07/19/2004
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego) 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA, 92101 (voice) 206.749.5544, (fax) 206.749.9978, info@lerachlaw.com Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP 275 Madison Ave 34th Flr, New York, NY, 10016 (voice) 212.682.1818, (fax) 212.682.1892, email@murrayfrank.com Schatz & Nobel, P.C. 330 Main Street, Hartford, CT, 06106 (voice) 800.797.5499, (fax) 860.493.6290, sn06106@AOL.com Schiffrin & Barroway LLP 3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004 (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com Wechsler Harwood, LLP. 488 Madison Avenue 8th Floor, New York, NY, 10022 (voice) 212.935.7400, (fax) 212.753.3630, info@whesq.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 5

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Class Action Complaint
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 09/30/2004
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 03/07/2005
Plaintiffs’ Joint Stipulation And Order To Consolidate The Actions, Appoint Lead Plaintiff, And To Approve Lead Plaintiff’s Selection Of Co-Lead Counsel
Type: Order		Date on the document: 04/22/2005
Joint Case Management Conference Statement And Proposed Scheduling Order
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/08/2005
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Continuing Case Management Conference To Hearing On Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/08/2005
Stipulation And Order Continuing Case Management Conference To Hearing On Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/10/2005

REFERENCE COMPLAINT

In Re: Infineon Technologies AG Securities Litigation

COURT: N.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 04-CV-04156
JUDGE NAME:
DATE FILED: 11/08/2010	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/13/2000	CLASS PERIOD END: 07/19/2004
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Fourth Amended
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbin (San Francisco) 100 Pine Street, Suite 2600, San Francisco, CA, 94111 (voice) 415.288.4545, (fax) 415.288.4534, info@lerachlaw.com Lerach Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP (San Diego) 401 B Street, Suite 1700, San Diego, CA, 92101 (voice) 206.749.5544, (fax) 206.749.9978, info@lerachlaw.com Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP 275 Madison Ave 34th Flr, New York, NY, 10016 (voice) 212.682.1818, (fax) 212.682.1892, email@murrayfrank.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 3

DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
Appendix To Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/30/2005
Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 06/30/2005
Summons In A Civil Case
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/03/2005
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/12/2005
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 08/12/2005
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 08/12/2005
Summons In A Civil Case
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/05/2005
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/07/2005
Declaration Of Mia Mazza In Support Of Stipulation Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 10/07/2005
[Proposed] Order Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/07/2005
Stipulation Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/07/2005
Appendix Of Unpublished Authorities Cited In Defendants' Motion To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
Declaration Of Mark R.S. Foster In Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Motion To Dismiss
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
Notice Of Motion And Motion By Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws; Supporting Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
Notice Of Motion And Motion By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint; Supporting Memorandum Of Points & Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
Order Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/12/2005
Order Continuing Case Management Conference
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/21/2005
Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The Consolidated Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/05/2005
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 12/05/2005
Order Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 12/20/2005
Stipulation And Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 12/21/2005
Appendix Of Unpublished Authorities Cited In Defendants’ Reply Briefs In Support Of Motions To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/09/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/09/2006
Reply Brief Of Defendants Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 01/09/2006
Reply Brief Of Defendants Infineon Technologies Ag, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 01/09/2006
Supplemental Declaration Of Mark R.S. Foster In Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 01/09/2006
Reply Brief Of Defendants Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 01/11/2006
Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Subsequent Authority
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 02/13/2006
Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Subsequent Authority
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 02/14/2006
Order Continuing Case Management Conference
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/15/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/21/2006
Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Decisions
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/21/2006
Defendants’ Statement Of Recent Decisions
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/21/2006
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Decisions
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/21/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/09/2006
Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Second Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/09/2006
Defendants’ Second Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/09/2006
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Second Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/09/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/04/2006
Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Defendants’ Third Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/04/2006
Defendants’ Third Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/04/2006
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Defendants’ Third Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Order		Date on the document: 04/04/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/13/2006
Defendants’ Fourth Statement Of Recent Decisions
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/13/2006
Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Defendants’ Fourth Statement Of Recent Decisisions
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/13/2006
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request For Leave To File Defendants’ Fourth Statement Of Recent Decisions
Type: Order		Date on the document: 04/13/2006
Plaintiffs’ Notice Of Subsequent Authority
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 04/21/2006
Joint Case Management Conference Statement
Type: Other		Date on the document: 05/09/2006
Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Motions To Dismiss; Order Rescheduling Case Management Conference
Type: Order		Date on the document: 05/16/2006
Corrected Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Motions To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 05/22/2006
Appendix Of Unpublished Authorities Cited In Motion For Leave To File For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order And [Proposed] Motion For Partial Reconsideration Attached As Exhibit A Thereto
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/12/2006
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/12/2006
Notice Of Motion And Motion By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl For Leave To File Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 06/12/2006
[Proposed] Order Granting Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl Leave To File Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/12/2006
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/16/2006
Defendants’ [Proposed] Scheduling Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/16/2006
Joint Case Management Statement
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/16/2006
Plaintiffs’ [Proposed] Case Management Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/16/2006
Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Defendants’ Motion For Leave To File Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/20/2006
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/21/2006
Notice Of Motion And Motion By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 06/21/2006
Order Granting Motion For Leave To File Motion For Reconsideration
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/21/2006
Order Rescheduling Case Management Conference
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/21/2006
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/27/2006
Order Granting Application For Admission Of Attorney Pro Hac Vice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/27/2006
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing On Defendants’ Motion For Partial Reconsideration
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/27/2006
Stipulation And Order Revising Schedule For Briefing And Hearing On Defendants’ Motion For Partial Reconsideration
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/28/2006
Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendants' Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order
Type: Other		Date on the document: 07/14/2006
Appendix Of Unpublished Authorities Cited In Reply Brief In Support Of Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order
Type: Other		Date on the document: 07/28/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 7/28/2006
Reply Brief Of Defendants Infineon Technologies Ag, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl In Support Of Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 07/28/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/09/2006
Defendants’ Statement Of Recent Decision Relevant To Their Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of May 22, 2006 Order
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/09/2006
Civil Minutes
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/11/2006
Order Granting Defendants’ Motion For Reconsideration Of The Court’s May 22, 2006 Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 09/11/2006
Appendix To Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/11/2006
Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 10/11/2006
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/23/2006
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Setting Schedule For Briefing And Hearing On Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/23/2006
Stipulation And Order Setting Schedule For Briefing And Hearing On Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/25/2006
Appendix Of Unreported Cases Cited In Defendants' Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 11/17/2006
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/17/2006
Declaration Of Mark Foster In Support Of Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 11/17/2006
Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice Filed In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/17/2006
Notice Of Motion And Motion By Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws; Supporting Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 11/17/2006
Notice Of Motion And Motion By Infineon Technologies Ag, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws; Supporting Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 11/17/2006
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/17/2006
Declaration Of John K. Grant In Support Of Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Motion To Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Filed By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 12/29/2006
Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Motion To Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Filed By Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/29/2006
Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Motion To Dismiss Second Amended Complaint Filed By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/29/2006
Appendix Of Unreported Cases Cited In Defendants' Reply Briefs In Support Of Their Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/22/2007
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/22/2007
Reply Brief Of Defendants Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 01/22/2007
Reply Brief Of Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 01/22/2007
Order Continuing Hearing On Defendant's Motion To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/06/2007
Statement Of Recent Decision In Support Of Plaintiffs’ Oppositions To Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/08/2007
Clerk's Notice
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 03/13/2007
Appendix To Motion For Leave To File Third Amended Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/26/2007
Appendix To Third Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/26/2007
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File Third Amended Complaint For Violation Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 03/26/2007
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion For Leave To File Third Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/26/2007
[Proposed] Third Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 03/26/2007
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint, The Filing Of A Third Amended Complaint, And Vacating Hearing Dates
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/30/2007
Stipulation And Order Regarding Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint, The Filing Of A Third Amended Complaint, And Vacating Hearing Dates
Type: Order		Date on the document: 04/02/2007
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding (1) The Filing Of Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint And (2) A Briefing And Hearing Schedule For Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 05/02/2007
Stipulation And Order Regarding (1) The Filing Of Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint And (2) A Briefing And Hearing Schedule For Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 05/04/2007
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order On Schedule For Filing Amended Complaint And Defendants' Motions To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 07/16/2007
Appendix to Third Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 07/17/2007
Stipulation And Order On Schedule For Filing Amended Complaint And Defendants' Motions To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 07/17/2007
Third Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 07/17/2007
Appendix Of Unreported Cases Cited In Support Of Defendants' Motions To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint And Request For Judicial Notice
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
Declaration Of Mark Foster In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint Filed By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
Defendants' Request For Judicial Notice Filed In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
Notice Of Motion And Motion By Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint; Notice Of Joinder And Joinder; And Supporting Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint Filed By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl; Supporting Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Motions To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
Supplemental Declaration Of Joni Ostler In Support Of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 08/27/2007
Notice of Firm Name Change
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 09/12/2007
Notice Of Change Of Firm Name And Address
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 10/01/2007
Declaration Of John K. Grant In Support Of Plaintiffs' Opposition To Motion To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint Filed By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 10/2/2007
Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Motion To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint Filed By Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/02/2007
Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Motion To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint Filed By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/02/2007
Appendix Of Unreported Cases Cited In Support Of Reply To Defendants' Motions To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint And Request For Judicial Notice
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/24/2007
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/24/2007
Defendants' Supplemental Request For Judicial Notice Filed In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/24/2007
Reply Brief Of Defendants Heinrich Florian And T. Rudd Corwin In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 10/24/2007
Reply Brief Of Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Third Amended Complaint
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 10/24/2007
Supplemental Declaration Of Mark R.S. Foster In Support Of The Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint Filed By Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp., Ulrich Schumacher, And Peter J. Fischl
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 10/24/2007
Civil Minutes
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/19/2007
Plaintiff's Motion For Administrative Relief For Leave To Submit Authority Responsive To Court Inquiry
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 11/21/2007
[Proposed] Order On Plaintiffs' Motion For Administrative Relief For Leave To Submit Authority Responsive To Court Inquiry
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/21/2007
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/27/2007
Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs ' Motion For Administrative Relief For Leave To Submit Authority And Argument
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/27/2007
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/15/2008
Defendants' Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/15/2008
Defendants' Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/15/2008
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Decision
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/15/2008
Plaintiffs' Limited Objection To Defendants' Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/17/2008
Plaintiffs' Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/18/2008
Plaintiffs' Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/18/2008
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Decision
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/18/2008
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 01/18/2008
Certificate Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/22/2008
Defendants' Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Orders
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/22/2008
Defendants' Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Orders
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/22/2008
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Orders
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/22/2008
Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants' Motions To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/25/2008
Plaintiffs' Limited Objection To Defendants' January 22, 2008 Request For Leave To File Statement Of Recent Supreme Court Orders
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/25/2008
Plaintiffs' Notice Of Motion And Motion For Leave To File Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of January 25, 2008 Order
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 02/08/2008
[Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs' Request For Leave To File Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of January 25, 2008 Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/08/2008
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/11/2008
Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To File Motion For Partial Reconsideration Of January 25, 2008 Order
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/11/2008
Order Denying Leave To File Additional Authorities; Denying Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave To File Motion For Reconsideration
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/14/2008
Joint Case Management Statement And [Proposed] Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/15/2008
Scheduling Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 02/26/2008
ADR Certification By Parties And Counsel
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/11/2008
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/11/2008
Stipulation And Order Selecting ADR Pjcess
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/13/2008
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/24/2008
Declaration Of Mark R.S. Foster In Support Of Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 03/24/2008
Defendants' Notice Of Motion And Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations; Supporting Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 03/24/2008
Defendants' Request For Judicial Notice Filed In Support Of Their Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Type: Other		Date on the document: 03/24/2008
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/24/2008
Order Administratively Closing Cases
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/31/2008
Order Granting Application For Admission Of Attorney Pro Hac Vice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 04/10/2008
Declaration Of John K. Grant In Support Of Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 04/16/2008
Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/16/2008
Plaintiffs' Request For Judicial Notice Filed In Support Of Their Opposition To Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/16/2008
Defendants' Reply Brief In Support Of Their Motion For Summary Judgment Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 05/14/2008
Certificate of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 05/15/2008
Defendants’ Answer To Third Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 05/15/2008
Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment
Type: Order		Date on the document: 08/13/2008
Defendants' Notice Of Motion And Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings As To Reinhard Schroeder And All Other "Foreign Purchasers" Or, In The Alternative, To Dismiss For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Supporting Memorandum Of Points And Authorities
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 08/25/2008
Notice of Confirmation of Withdrawal of Lead Plaintiffs Karen Gurvey and Mark Gurvey
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 09/05/2008
Defendants' Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/14/2008
Reply In Support Of Defendants' Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings As To Reinhard Schroeder And All Other "Foreign Purchasers" Or, In The Alternative, To Dismiss For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/05/2008
Stipulation And Order Setting Hearing For Plaintiffs’ Motion For Class Certification And Defendants’ Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Or In The Alternative To Dismiss For Lack Of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/11/2008
Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Joinder; Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/06/2009
Notice of Entry of Ninth Circuit Order Granting Defendants' Rule 23(f) Petition for Permission to Appeal This Court's March 6, 2009 Class Certification Order
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 05/05/2009
Order Staying Case
Type: Order		Date on the document: 05/13/2009
Further Joint Case Management Conference Statement
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/22/2010
Appendix To The Fourth Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/08/2010
Fourth Amended Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 11/08/2010
Declaration Of John K. Grant In Support Of Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 01/24/2011
Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Fourth Amended Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/24/2011
Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendants' Motion To Strike Portions Of Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/14/2011
Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss With Leave To Amend; Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants’ Motion To Strike
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/17/2011
Stipulation Of Settlement
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/20/2011
[Proposed] Order Awarding Colead Counsel Attorneys’ Fees And Expenses
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/17/2011
Supplemental Memorandum In Support Of Final Approval Of Class Action Settlement And The Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds; And Award Of Attorneys’ Fee And Expenses
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 10/17/2011
Declaration Of Joy Ann Bull Providing Further Information Regarding Opt-Out
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 10/25/2011
Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/01/2011
Order Approving Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/02/2011
Order Awarding Co-Lead Counsel Attorneys’ Fees And Expenses
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/02/2011
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 11/02/2011

OTHER DOCUMENTS
Class Action Complaint
Case Name and/or Number: 04-CV-4189; Hadfield
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 10/04/2004
Notice of Change of Firm Name
Case Name and/or Number: 04-CV-4189; Hadfield
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 10/29/2004
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Case Name and/or Number: Thomas Hadfield, et al. v. Infineon Technologies AG, et al.
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 03/07/2005
Civil Minutes
Case Name and/or Number: In Re: Infineon Technologies AG Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/25/2008
Appellants’ Reply Brief
Case Name and/or Number: In Re: Infineon Technologies AG Securities Litigation
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 12/16/2009
Mandate
Case Name and/or Number: James Dolan, et al. v. Infineon Technologies AG, et al.
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/14/2010

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�