Gilead Sciences, Inc. - Securities Class Action

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Litigation Activity Indices

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Gilead Sciences, Inc. Summary: The original complaint charges Gilead and certain of its officers and directors with violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated by the SEC. The complaint alleges that in an effort to allow Gilead insiders to sell their Gilead stock at artificially inflated prices, defendants falsely represented that strong sales of Viread, the Company's HIV drug, during the second quarter of 2003 was due to an increase in prescriptions and not, as some analysts had cautioned, due to inventory build-up by distributors stocking up ahead of a price increase. Such statements were materially false and misleading because, as defendants knew or recklessly disregarded, a material portion of the second quarter Viread sales were attributable to distributors stocking up ahead of a price increase. Gilead insiders sold a total of 303,981 shares in August 2003 at artificially inflated prices, reaping gross proceeds of $19,365,998. On October 28, 2003, Gilead announced that sales of Viread in the third quarter of 2003 would be materially less than expected because distributors would meet end-user demand for Viread by selling off overstock they accumulated in the second quarter. In reaction to this announcement, the price of Gilead common stock plummeted, falling $7.46 in one day, from a close of $59.46 per share on October 28, 2003 to $52 per share on October 29, 2003.

As summarized by the Company’s FORM 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, tthe court issued an order consolidating the lawsuits into a single action on December 22, 2003. On February 9, 2004, the court issued an order appointing lead plaintiffs in the consolidated action. On April 30, 2004, the lead plaintiffs, on behalf of the purported class, filed their consolidated amended complaint. On June 21, 2004, the Company and individual defendants filed their motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. On January 4, 2005, the court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss with leave to amend. Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on February 25, 2005 and a third amended complaint on March 11, 2005. On October 11, 2005, the court granted the defendants’ notion to dismiss the third amended complaint with leave to amend. On December 2, 2005, the plaintiffs filed a fourth consolidated amended complaint. The court heard defendants’ motion to dismiss on February 21, 2006, took the matter under submission and has yet to render its decision. On May 12, the Court entered the Order signed by U.S. District Judge Martin J. Jenkins granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss. Three days later, on May 15, 2006, the Court entered Judgment and the civil case was terminated. The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal.

According to a press release dated August 12, 2008, a California appeals court reinstated a securities class action lawsuit on Monday against Gilead Sciences that claimed the drug maker misled investors about demand for its HIV drug Viread, Reuters reports. The lawsuit accused Gilead of fostering demand for Viread by using improper marketing, including aggressively promoting off-label uses for the drug after US regulators ordered the company to stop. The Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a San Francisco district court's decision to dismiss the case on the grounds that investors had failed to prove that their 2003 stock losses were related to the off-label sales and to alleged false statements the company made about Viread. "Gilead's fortunes, as reflected in its stock price, depended heavily on Viread's commercial success," the appeals court wrote in its opinion. "Ultimately, 75 per cent to 95 per cent of Viread sales resulted from off-label marketing efforts," the court said.

According to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, on February 6, 2009, we filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, requesting that the court review the judgment of the court of appeals. In April 2009, the Supreme Court of the United States denied our petition. The case continues before the district court. On February 13, 2009, we filed a further motion to dismiss the fourth consolidated amended complaint on alternative grounds.

According to an article dated June 3, 2009, citing contradictory witness testimony, a federal judge agreed Wednesday to partially dismiss a consolidated securities class action against Gilead Sciences Inc. but granted the shareholder plaintiffs leave to revise their fourth amended complaint. Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that statements in the complaint by a confidential plaintiff witness – a former Gilead sales representative - were inconsistent with earlier statements in a preceding complaint and could not be relied on. Gilead's motion to dismiss the suit was set for a hearing Friday, but Judge Illston ruled the scheduled oral argument unnecessary and vacated the hearing. She ordered the plaintiffs to file a fifth amended complaint by June 26.

On July 10, 2009, the lead plaintiffs filed a Fifth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws. The defendants responded by filing a motion to dismiss on August 12, 2009, and on October 13, 2009, Judge Illston granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ motion to dismiss the fifth consolidated amended complaint.

According to the Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order filed on March 11, 2010, the parties are now pleased to report to the Court that they have reached an agreement-in-principle to settle this action; and the parties are now proceeding with the drafting of a class action settlement stipulation and related documents, including the Notice to the Class, all of which will require Court approval.

On June 28, 2010, the parties filed a Stipulation of Settlement. The settlement is in the amount of $8.25 million. The plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary approval of the proposed settlement, which was approved on July 8, 2010. The Final Approval Hearing was set for November 5, 2010, and on that day, the Honorable Susan Illston approved the settlement, granted the motion for attorney fees and expenses, and dismissed the action with prejudice.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 2836
Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Gilead Sciences, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	GILD
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.gilead.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

Rick Hartman, et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., et al.

COURT: N.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 03-CV-4999
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Martin J. Jenkins
DATE FILED: 11/10/2003	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/14/2003	CLASS PERIOD END: 10/28/2003
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (New York, 42 Street) 60 East 42 Street, New York, NY, 10021 (voice) 212.687.6655, (fax) , Cauley Geller Bowman Coates & Rudman, LLP (New York) 200 Broadhollow, Suite 406, Melville, NY, 11747 (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173, Cauley, Geller, Bowman, Coates & Rudman LLP (San Diego, CA) 225 Broadway, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA, 92010 (voice) 619.702.7350, (fax) 619.702.7351, Cohen, Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C. (Washington, DC) 1100 New York Avenue, N.W., Suite 500, West Tower, Washington, DC, 20005 (voice) 202.408.4600, (fax) 202.408.4699, lawinfo@cmht.com Glancy and Binkow 1801 Avenue of the Stars, suite 311, Los Angeles, CA, 90067 (voice) 310-201-9150, (fax) , info@glancylaw.com Green & Jigarjian LLP 235 Pine Street, 15th Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94104 (voice) 415.477.6700, (fax) 415.477.6710, James Orman 1600 Market Street, Suite 1416 , Philadelphia, PA, 19103 (voice) 215.523.7800, (fax) , Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A. World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Baltimore, MD, 21202 (voice) 410.332.0030, (fax) , pivenlaw@erols.com Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY) One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10119-1065 (voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) , Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP 275 Madison Ave 34th Flr, New York, NY, 10016 (voice) 212.682.1818, (fax) 212.682.1892, email@murrayfrank.com Schiffrin & Barroway LLP 3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004 (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 11

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Class Action Complaint For Violation Of Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 11/10/2003
Declaration Of Robert S. Green In Support Of Motion To Appoint Terry Johnson Lead Plaintiff
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 01/12/2004
Exhibit E - part 1
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/12/2004
Exhibit E - part 2
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/12/2004
Exhibit F
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/12/2004
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Appoint Terry Johnson Lead Plaintiff
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 01/12/2004
Proof Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 01/12/2004
[Proposed] Order Appointing Terry Johnson As Lead Plaintiff
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/12/2004
Stipulation And Order Of Lead Plaintiff Applicants To Appoint Lead Plaintiffs And To Approve Lead Plaintiffs' Selection Of Lead Counsel And Liaison Counsel
Type: Order Appointing LP/LC		Date on the document: 02/09/2004

REFERENCE COMPLAINT

In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation

COURT: N.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 03-CV-4999
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Susan Illston
DATE FILED: 07/10/2009	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/14/2003	CLASS PERIOD END: 10/28/2003
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Fifth Amended and Consolidated
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Geller Rudman, PLLC. 197 South Federal Highway, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL, 33432 (voice) 561.750.3000, (fax) 888.262.3131, info@geller-rudman.com Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (Seattle, WA) 1001 Fourth Avenue - Suite 3200, Seattle, WA, 98154 (voice) 206.839.0730, (fax) , _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 2

DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violation Of Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 04/30/2004
Declaration Of Grant Fondo In Support Of Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 06/21/2004
Defendants’ Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 06/21/2004
Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/21/2004
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint And Granting Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/21/2004
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/19/2004
Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/19/2004
Defendants' Reply Memorandum in Support Of Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/20/2004
Amended Order Granting Defendants’ 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/26/2005
Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violation Of Federal Securities Laws - Demand For Jury Trial
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 02/25/2005
Third Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 03/11/2005
Declaration Of Grant Fondo In Support Of Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 05/10/2005
Defendants' Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 05/10/2005
Defendants' Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 05/10/2005
Proof Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 05/10/2005
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint And Granting Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 05/10/2005
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The Third Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 07/11/2005
Declaration Of Grant Fondo In Support Of Defendants’ Supplemental Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 08/15/2005
Defendants' Reply Memorandum In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 08/15/2005
Defendants’ Reply Memorandum In Support Of Their Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 08/15/2005
Defendants’ Supplemental Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/15/2005
Proof of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/15/2005
Clerk's Notice
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 09/21/2005
Civil Minutes
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/04/2005
Order Granting Defendants’ 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/11/2005
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re Filing Of The Fourth Amended Complaint And Briefing Schedule For Motion To Dismiss Same
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/07/2005
Stipulation And Order Re Filing Of The Fourth Amended Complaint And Briefing Schedule For Motion To Dismiss Same
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/08/2005
Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violation Of Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 12/02/2005
Declaration Of John C. Dwyer In Support Of Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss The Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 12/22/2005
Defendants' Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint; Memorandum Of Points Andauthorities In Support Thereof
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 12/22/2005
Defendants' Request For Judicial Notice In Support Of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complain
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/22/2005
Proof of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/22/2005
[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint And Granting Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 12/22/2005
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Permitting Briefs To Be Filed In Excess Of Page Limitations
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/13/2006
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 01/17/2006
Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/19/2006
Plaintiffs’ Corrected Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 01/20/2006
Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Re: Extension Of Time To File Reply To Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The Fourth Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/23/2006
Stipulation And Order Re: Extension Of Time To File Reply To Plaintiffs’ Opposition To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss The Fourth Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/24/2006
Defendants’ Reply Memorandum In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 02/03/2006
Proof Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/03/2006
Defendants’ Corrected Reply Memorandum In Support Of Their Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 02/06/2006
Proof Of Service
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/06/2006
Civil Minutes
Type: Other		Date on the document: 02/21/2006
Order Granting Defendants’12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss
Type: Order		Date on the document: 05/12/2006
Judgment in a Civil Case
Type: Other		Date on the document: 05/15/2006
Certificate Of Record
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/29/2006
Notice Of Change Of Address Of Counsel
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 02/07/2007
Notice Of Change Of Law Firm Name
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 02/07/2007
Notice Of Withdrawl
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 02/07/2007
Notice of Change of Law Firm Name
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 07/12/2007
Letter
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/29/2007
Defendants - Appellees' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing en Banc
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 08/13/2008
Notice of Appearance of Counsel for Defendants - Appellees
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 08/28/2008
Petition for Rehearing En Banc and for Panel Rehearing
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/02/2008
Letter
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/12/2008
Application for an Extension of Time Within Which to File a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/19/2008
Plaintiffs’ Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To Defendants’ Motion All Actions To Dismiss The Fourth Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 04/14/2009
Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Fourth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint With Leave To Amend
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/03/2009
Fifth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 07/10/2009
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Fifth Consolidated Amended Complaint
Type: Memorandum		Date on the document: 09/04/2009
Order Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Fifth Amended Complaint
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/13/2009
Answer Of Defendants Gilead Sciences, Inc., John C. Martin, John F. Milligan, Mark L. Perry, Norbert W. Bischofberger, Anthony Carraciolo And William A. Lee To Plaintiffs’ Fifth Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/16/2009
Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Regarding Agreement-In-Principle To Settle And Related Scheduling Deadlines
Type: Order		Date on the document: 03/11/2010
Notice Of Proposed Settlement Of Class Action - Exhibit A-1
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 06/28/2010
Proof of Claim and Release
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/28/2010
[Proposed] Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement And Providing For Notice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 06/28/2010
Stipulation of Settlement
Type: Settlement		Date on the document: 06/28/2010
Summary Notice - Exhibit A-3
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 06/28/2010
Notice Of Unopposed Motion And Unopposed Motion For Preliminary Approval Of Class Action Settlement And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 06/29/2010
[Proposed] Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement And Providing For Notice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 07/07/2010
Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement And Providing For Notice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 07/08/2010
Declaration of Jeffrey D. Light Filed On Behalf Of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd Llp In Support Of Application For Award Of Attorneys' Fees And Expenses
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 09/16/2010
Joint Declaration Of David J. George And Lori G. Feldman In Support Of Motion For Final Approval Of Class Action Settlement And Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds; And An Ward Of Attorneys' Fees And Expenses
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 09/16/2010
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Final Approval Of Class Action Settlement And Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 09/16/2010
Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel's Notice Of Motion And Motion For An Award Of Attorneys' Fees And Expenses And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 09/16/2010
Lead Plaintiffs' Notice Of Non-Objection To Motion For (1) Final Approval Of Class Action Settlement And Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds; And (2) Award Of Attorneys' Fees And Expenses
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 10/29/2010
[Proposed] Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/29/2010
[Proposed] Order Approving Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/29/2010
[Proposed] Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees And Expenses
Type: Order Approving AF&E		Date on the document: 10/29/2010
Order Awarding Attorneys' Fees And Expenses
Type: Order Approving AF&E		Date on the document: 11/05/2010
[Proposed] Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/05/2010
[Proposed] Order Approving Plan Of Allocation of Settlement Proceeds
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/05/2010
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 11/08/2010

OTHER DOCUMENTS
Class Action Complaint
Case Name and/or Number: Campagnuola, et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 11/17/2003
Class Action Complaint for Violation of Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded
Case Name and/or Number: Sue Kim, et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 11/18/2003
Class Action Complaint For Violation Of Federal Securities Laws
Case Name and/or Number: Michael J. Booth DDS PC, Profit Sharing & Trust
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 12/23/2003
Court Transcript
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 3/14/2006
Notice Of Appeal And Ninth Circuit Rule 3-2 Representation Statement
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 6/9/2006
Transcript Designation And Ordering Form
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 6/19/2006
Appelant's Opening Brief
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 10/10/2006
Notice Of Change Of Address
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 10/10/2006
Appeal From the United States District Court For The Northern District Of California Master File No. C-03-4999-MJJ The Honorable Martin J . Jenkins
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/17/2006
Defendant's Appellee's Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To File Answering Brief; Supporting Declaration Of Lori R Ploeger
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 10/30/2006
Corporate Disclosure Statement
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/31/2006
Appleant's Unopposed Motion For 28-Day Extension To File Reply Brief
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 12/15/2006
Appellant's Reply Brief
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Brief		Date on the document: 1/23/2007
Letter
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/25/2007
Notice Of Appearance Of Counsel For Defendants-Appellees
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 10/29/2007
Acknowledgment Of Hearing Notice
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/01/2007
Acknowledgment Of Hearing Notice
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/01/2007
Acknowledgment Of Hearing Notice
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/01/2007
Declaration Of Grant P. Fondo In Support Of Motion For Continuance Of Oral Argument
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 11/01/2007
Motion For Continuance Of Oral Argument
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 11/01/2007
Acknowledgment Of Hearing Notice
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/02/2007
Notice Of Appearance Of Counsel For Defendants-Appellees
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 11/02/2007
Plaintiffs'-Appellants' Opposition To Motion For Continuance Of Oral Argument
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/08/2007
Declaration Of Jeffrey J. Hessekiel In Support Of Reply In Support Of Motion For Continuance
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 11/16/2007
Reply In Support Of Motion For Continuance Of Oral Argument
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/16/2007
Letter to Ms. Cathy Catterson, Clerk
Case Name and/or Number: In re Gilead Sciences Securities Litigation
Type: Other		Date on the document: 11/27/2007
Opinion from the United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Case Name and/or Number: Rick Hartman, et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., et al.
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/11/2008
Mandate from the United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Case Name and/or Number: Rick Hartman, et al. v. Gilead Sciences, Inc., et al.
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/17/2008

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�