Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


American Business Financial Services, Inc.
Conclusion: According to a press release dated June 9, 2005, in a ruling that strictly enforces the "particularity" requirements of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, a federal judge has dismissed a class action suit against top executives at American Business Financial Services Inc. after finding that the plaintiffs lacked detailed evidence to back up their claim that false and misleading statements were made to investors. In the suit, investors allege that ABFS - a now-bankrupt financial services company that specialized in home equity loans - used improper accounting practices to hide its high rate of delinquent loans.

The Complaint alleges that defendants ABFI violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. More specifically, the Complaint alleges that, during the Class Period, defendants failed to disclose and indicate (1) the Company used a deception to take homes from delinquent borrowers in order keep its delinquency rate low; (2) that the deception allowed the Company to skip the normal foreclosure process more frequently; (3) that the deception helped the Company to reduce its delinquency rate in its $3.6 billion loan portfolio; (4) as result of reducing its delinquency rate in its $3.6 billion loan portfolio, the Company was able to securitize more loans; and (5) were thus able to collect interest income from its securitized loans and inflate its financial results.

Further, the press release said that, on June 13, 2003, the Company disclosed that it had received a civil subpoena from the U.S. Department of Justice requesting that ABFI provide documents relating to mortgage loan transactions and securitization agreements. On news of this, shares of ABFI fell 20% to close at $8.27 per share. On June 26, 2003, ABFI disclosed that it anticipated incurring a loss for the quarter and year ended June 30, 2003 due to its inability to complete its quarterly securitization of loans. On news of this, shares of ABFI fell 12% to close at $7.40 per share.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6162
Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: American Business Financial Services, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: ABFI
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.abfsonline.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Weisinger, et al. v. American Business Financial Services, Inc., et al.
 COURT: E.D. Pennsylvania  DOCKET NUMBER: 04-CV-265
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Harvey Bartle
 DATE FILED: 01/21/2004  SOURCE: Complaint
 CLASS PERIOD START: 01/27/2000  CLASS PERIOD END: 06/25/2003
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Cauley Geller Bowman Coates & Rudman, LLP (New York)
      200 Broadhollow, Suite 406, Melville, NY, 11747
       (voice) 631.367.7100, (fax) 631.367.1173,
  • Law Offices of Brian M. Felgoise, P.C.
      Esquire at 261 Old York Road, Suite 423, Jenkintown, PA, 19046
       (voice) 215.886.1900, (fax) , securitiesfraud@comcast.net
  • Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A.
      World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Baltimore, MD, 21202
       (voice) 410.332.0030, (fax) , pivenlaw@erols.com
  • Law Offices of Marc S. Henzel
      335 Central Avenue, Lawrence, NY, 11559
       (voice) 516.374.0707, (fax) 516.295.3473, securitiesfraud@comcast.net
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA)
      600 West Broadway, 1800 One America Plaza, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 800.449.4900, (fax) , support@milberg.com
  • Murray, Frank & Sailer LLP
      275 Madison Ave 34th Flr, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.682.1818, (fax) 212.682.1892, email@murrayfrank.com
  • Schiffrin & Barroway LLP
      3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  7

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/23/2004
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/13/2004

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Weisinger, et al. v. American Business Financial Services, Inc., et al.
     COURT: E.D. Pennsylvania  DOCKET NUMBER: 04-CV-265
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Thomas O'Neill
     DATE FILED: 08/19/2004  SOURCE: Business Wires
     CLASS PERIOD START: 01/27/2000  CLASS PERIOD END: 06/25/2003
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Geller Rudman, PLLC.
      197 South Federal Highway, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL, 33432
       (voice) 561.750.3000, (fax) 888.262.3131, info@geller-rudman.com
  • Schiffrin & Barroway LLP
      3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Memorandum and Order
    Type: Memorandum Date on the document: 06/02/2005
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 09/22/2005

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Ruane
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/28/2004

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top