Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. : Various Securities of the Technology Group

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Credit Suisse First Boston Corp. : Various Securities of the Technology Group Conclusion: Pursuant to the Court’s Order granting the plaintiff’s motion to remand, Judgment was entered on October 24,2003, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants. The case was remanded to Superior Court of the State of California and the civil case was terminated.

This class action lawsuit was originally filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Santa Clara, and it was brought pursuant to section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code.

On July 24, 2003, the filing of State of California was removed to the United States District Court for Northern District of California pursuant to the provisions 28 of the U.S.C., sections 1331, 1441(a), and 1441(b). According to the Notice of Removal, the Northern District of California Court has exclusive original jurisdiction pursuant to the provisions 15 of the U.S.C. section 78aa, given that with this action Plaintiff seeks to implement and/or enforce rules promulgated by the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") and the National Association of Securities Dealers ("NASD").

The complaint filed in the State Court alleges that Credit Suisse's Technology Group regularly issued research reports that were not based on principles of fair dealing and good faith and did not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts, contained exaggerated or unwarranted claims about covered companies, and/or contained opinions for which there was no reasonable bases in violation of NYSE Rules 28 401,472 and 476(a)(6), and NASD Rules 2110 and 2210. In addition, in the original complaint plaintiff seeks disgorgement of defendants' illegally obtained profits, and injunctive relief to put the investor on notice of any relationship between the investment bank issuing research reports and the company which the analyst is covering and to stop the defendants' further improper conduct.

This lawsuit was brought on behalf of Jerome Feitelberg and all other persons and entities resident in the State of California who held shares anytime during the period from July 1, 1998 to December 31, 2001 of the following companies: Gematar, Allaire, Razorflsh, DIGI, Synopsys, Nurnerical, Agilent, Winstar, AOL, and Lantronix and were injured thereby.

NOTE: The filing date below corresponds to the date of filing in the Superior Court of the State of California County of Santa Clara.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6211
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Credit Suisse First Boston Corp.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	CSR
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.credit-suisse.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

Jerome Feitelberg, et al. v. Credit Suisse First Boston Corp., et al.

COURT: N.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 03-CV-3451
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Samuel Conti
DATE FILED: 06/16/2003	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 07/01/1998	CLASS PERIOD END: 12/31/2001
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP 595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94105-2835sco (voice) 800.778.1822, (fax) 415.777.5189, info@gbcsf.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Civil Cover Sheet
Type: Other		Date on the document: 07/24/2003
Notice Of Removal To The United States District Court For The Northern District Of California Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. Section 1441(a)
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 07/24/2003
Judgment
Type: Other		Date on the document: 10/21/2003
Remand Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 10/24/2003
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 10/24/2003

OTHER DOCUMENTS

Case Name and/or Number:
Type:		Date on the document:

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�