Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


ClearOne Communications, Inc.
Conclusion: According to the docket, a Stipulation for Partial Settlement was entered on December 8, 2003. On March 17, 2004, the Court entered the Orders granting the motion for attorney fees and reimbursement of expense and granting the motion for Final Approval of Partial Settlement, Class Certification, and Plan of Allocation. The Court further entered the Order and Judgment dismissing the case against all defendants except Ernst & Young per the settlement agreement. The case was later dismissed with prejudice as to defendant Ernst & Young.

In a Press Release dated 12/18/03, ClearOne Communications, Inc. has received preliminary court approval of a settlement, and the hearing to consider final approval of the settlement is scheduled for 3/16/04.

In a Press Release dated 12/4/03, the terms of the settlement, which are subject to court approval, require the company to pay the shareholder class $5 million in cash and to transfer to them 1.2 million shares of the company's common stock. The cash payment is to be made in two equal installments of $2.5 million, the first of which has already been made and the second of which is due no later than January 15, 2005.

The originalComplaint charges ClearOne and certain of its executive officers with violations of federal securities laws. Among other things, plaintiff claims that defendants' material omissions and the dissemination of materially false and misleading statements concerning ClearOne's revenue and earnings caused ClearOne's stock price to become artificially inflated, inflicting damages on investors. The Complaint alleges that, in order to inflate the price of ClearOne's stock, defendants caused the Company to falsely report its financial results during the Class Period through improper revenue recognition practices, including recognizing revenue for shipments to distributors even though the distributors had the right to return or exchange unsold goods. On January 15, 2003, the last day of the Class Period, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a federal lawsuit alleging that defendants violated numerous federal securities laws, primarily through a program of "channel stuffing" - shipping large amounts of inventory to the company's distributors with the understanding that the distributors did not have to pay for these products until the distributors resold the products, and that in some instances the distributors were given the right to return or exchange products the distributors were unable to sell.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3663
Sector: Technology
Industry: Communications Equipment


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: ClearOne Communications, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: CLRO
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.gentner.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Anderton, et al. v. ClearOne Communications, Inc., et al.
 COURT: D. Utah  DOCKET NUMBER: 03-CV-0062
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Paul G. Cassell
 DATE FILED: 1/16/2003  SOURCE: Business Wires
 CLASS PERIOD START: 1/1/2001  CLASS PERIOD END: 1/15/2003
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Abbey Gardy, LLP
      212 East 39th Street, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.889.3700, (fax) , info@abbeygardy.com
  • Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz LLP (New York, NY)
      10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 800.217.1522, (fax) , info@bernlieb.com
  • Cauley Geller Bowman Coates & Rudman LLP (Little Rock, AR)
      P.O. Box 25438, Little Rock, AR, 72221-5438
       (voice) 501.312.8500, (fax) 501.312.8505,
  • Faruqi & Faruqi LLP
      320 East 39th Street, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.983.9330, (fax) 212.983.9331, Nfaruqi@faruqilaw.com
  • Glancy and Binkow
      1801 Avenue of the Stars, suite 311, Los Angeles, CA, 90067
       (voice) 310-201-9150, (fax) , info@glancylaw.com
  • Henricksen & Henricksen
      , , ,
       (voice) , (fax) ,
  • Kirby McInerney & Squire LLP
      830 Third Avenue 10th Floor, New York Ave, NY, 10022
       (voice) 212.317.2300, (fax) ,
  • Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A.
      World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Baltimore, MD, 21202
       (voice) 410.332.0030, (fax) , pivenlaw@erols.com
  • Spector Roseman & Kodroff (San Diego)
      1818 Market Street, Suite 2500, Philadelphia, PA, 19103
       (voice) 215.496.0300, (fax) 215.496.6611,
  • Weiss & Yourman (New York, NY)
      The French Building, 551 Fifth Ave., Suite 1600, New York, NY, 10126
       (voice) 212.682.3025, (fax) 212.682.3010, info@wyca.com
  • Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
      270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  11

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Law
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/16/2003

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Deborah Anderton, et al. v. ClearOne Communications, Inc., et al.
     COURT: D. Utah  DOCKET NUMBER: 03-CV-0062
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Paul G. Cassell
     DATE FILED: 6/30/2003  SOURCE: Business Wires
     CLASS PERIOD START: 4/17/2001  CLASS PERIOD END: 1/15/2003
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (New York, NY)
      805 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10022
       (voice) 212.687.1980, (fax) 212.687.7714, info@kaplanfox.com
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY)
      One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10119-1065
       (voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Order Appointing Lead Plaintiff, Appointing Lead Counsel, Sealing Fee Schedule And Setting Briefing Schedule
    Type: Order Date on the document: 5/1/2003
    Consolidated Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/30/2003
    Notice Of Pendency And Proposed Partial Settlement Of Class Action
    Type: Settlement Date on the document: 12/12/2003
    [Proposed] Order Preliminarily Approving Settlement And Providing For Notice
    Type: Order Date on the document: 12/12/2003
    Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Exchanging Exhibits To Stipulation Of Settlement
    Type: Order Date on the document: 12/12/2003
    Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/16/2004
    Order Approving Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds
    Type: Order Date on the document: 03/16/2004
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 05/23/2005

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Law
    Case Name and/or Number: John Robinson
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/23/2003

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top