 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. : Exodus Communications, Inc. Conclusion: On September 5, 2007, the Court issued the Opinion and Order No. 95140. According to the Order, U.S. District Judge John F. Keenan certified the class action, approved the settlement, approved the Plan of Allocation and finalized the award of attorneys’ fees and expenses. On September 19, 2007, the Court entered the Order and Final Judgment for In re Merrill Lynch Research Reports Securities Litigation, 02 MDL 1484.
According to the Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Actions, dated March 19, 2007, for In re Merrill Lynch Research Reports Securities Litigation, In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Exodus Communications, Inc. Research Reports Securities Litigation, 02-CV-6914, is part of a proposed settlement of $125 million in cash. A settlement hearing will be held before the Honorable John F. Keenan, United States District Judge of the Southern District of New York to determine whether the settlement should be approved.
On December 20, 2002, the Court entered the Case Management Order #1. According to the Order, the actions filed on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of Exodus Communications, Inc. were consolidated and now carried out under In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Exodus Communications, Inc. Research Reports Securities 02-CV-6914(MP). On March 14, 2003, an Amended Complaint was filed and the defendants responded by filing a motion to dismiss. On June 2, 2006, the Court entered the Minute Order signed by Judge Michael B. Mukasey administratively closing the case pursuant to Memorandum from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts dated June 15th, 1973.
In October 2002, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation granted the Merrill Lynch Defendants’ motion to transfer all such cases to the Southern District of New York for coordinated pre-trial proceedings. The cases were transferred to the Honorable Milton Pollack, Senior United States District Judge, and were coordinated under the caption In re Merrill Lynch Research Reports Securities Litigation, 02 MDL 1484.
The complaint alleges that defendants urged investors to purchase Exodus stock when defendants knew or recklessly disregarded that such purchases were not a good investment. The complaint alleges that defendants: issued "Buy" recommendations about Exodus without any rational economic basis; failed to disclose that they were issuing "Buy" recommendations to obtain investment banking business; and concealed significant, material conflicts of interest that prevented them from providing independent objective analysis. Between March 24, 2000 and September 26, 2001, Exodus stock dropped from approximately $173.32 per share to less than $1 dollar per share. During this time period, Merrill Lynch repeatedly reiterated its Near-Term Buy/Long-Term Buy recommendation. After the NASDAQ suspended trading in Exodus common stock on April 26, 2001, Exodus voluntarily de-listed from NASDAQ and filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy shortly thereafter. Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all those who purchased or otherwise acquired Exodus common stock during the Class Period.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7389
Sector: Services
Industry: Communications Services
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Exodus Communications, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | EXDS |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.exodus.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Pfeiffer, et al. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Type: | Date on the document: | ||
| REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| In re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Exodus Communications, Inc. Research Reports Securities | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 09/19/2007 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Corrected Class Action Complaint For Violations Of Federal Securities Laws | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Turoff, et al. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 09/05/2002 | ||
| Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws - Jury Trial Demanded | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Prakash P. Zadey, et al. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 10/01/2002 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Turoff, et al. v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 05/31/2006 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top