| |
Netsolve, Inc.
Conclusion: According to a Press Release dated December 13, 2001, the complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. On or about September 29, 1999, Netsolve commenced an initial public offering of 3,700,000 of its shares of common stock at an offering price of $13 per share (the "Netsolve IPO"). In connection therewith, Netsolve filed a registration statement, which incorporated a prospectus (the "Prospectus"), with the SEC. The complaint
further alleges that the Prospectus was materially false and misleading because it failed to disclose, among other things, that: (i) the underwriters had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the underwriters allocated to those investors material portions of the restricted number of Netsolve shares issued in connection with the Netsolve IPO; and (ii) the underwriters had entered into
agreements with customers whereby the underwriters agreed to allocate Netsolve shares to those customers in the Netsolve IPO in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional Netsolve shares in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7373
Sector: Technology
Industry: Computer Services
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE |
| Unknown Plaintiff, et al. v. Netsolve, Inc., et al. |
| COURT: S.D. New York | DOCKET NUMBER: 21 MC 92 (SAS) |
| JUDGE NAME: Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin |
| DATE FILED: 12/6/2001 | SOURCE: Business Wires | | CLASS PERIOD START: 9/29/1999 | CLASS PERIOD END: 12/6/2000 | | TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated) | | PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT: |
Bernard M. Gross 1500 Walnut Street, Suite 600, Philadelphia, PA, 19102
(voice) 215.561.3600, (fax) 215.561.3000, bmgross@BernardMGross.com
Law Offices of Charles J. Piven, P.A. World Trade Center-Baltimore,401 East Pratt Suite 2525, Baltimore, MD, 21202
(voice) 410.332.0030, (fax) , pivenlaw@erols.com
Savett Frutkin Podell & Ryan, P.C. , Philadelphia, PA,
(voice) 800.993.3233, (fax) , sfprpc@op.net
Stull, Stull & Brody (New York) 6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
(voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016
(voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com
_____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1 | | | DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | | | | Type: | Date on the document: | REFERENCE COMPLAINT | | In Re Netsolve, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation | | COURT: S.D. New York | DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-11239 | | JUDGE NAME: | | DATE FILED: 4/19/2002 | SOURCE: Business Wires | | CLASS PERIOD START: 9/29/1999 | CLASS PERIOD END: 12/6/2000 | | TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended | | PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT: |
Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz LLP (New York, NY) 10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016
(voice) 800.217.1522, (fax) , info@bernlieb.com
Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY) One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10119-1065
(voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) ,
Schiffrin & Barroway LLP 3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
(voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com
Sirota & Sirota LLP 110 Wall Street 21st Floor, New York, NY, 10005
(voice) 888.759.2990, (fax) 212.425.9093, Info@SirotaLaw.com
Stull, Stull & Brody (New York) 6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
(voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016
(voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com
_____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 6 | | | OTHER DOCUMENTS | | |
| Case Name and/or Number: |
| Type: | Date on the document: | WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top
|