![]() |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Radware Ltd. Summary: According to a Press Release dated 12/06/2001, the action claims Radware and certain of its officers violated the US federal securities laws by issuing and selling Radware common stock pursuant to Radware's IPO and a secondary offering without disclosing to investors that several of the underwriters of the Radware IPO had received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors. The complaint alleges that in exchange for the excessive commissions, the underwriters allocated shares to certain investors at the IPO price of $18 per share. In order to purchase the shares at $18, the underwriters' customers had to agree to purchase further shares in the aftermarket at progressively higher prices. The practice, known in Wall Street as 'laddering,' drove Radware's share price up to artificially high levels, giving both the underwriters and their customers enormous profits. During the first day of trading alone the share price rose as high as $49 from the $18 IPO price. In early trading yesterday Radware was at $11.18, 49.6% lower compared to the year earlier. The underwriters involved include Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., US Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc., Bank of America Corporation (Banc of America Securities LLC), FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc. (SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Capital Markets). INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION: SIC Code: 7389 Sector: Technology Industry: Computer Hardware
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||