Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Radware Ltd.
Summary: According to a Press Release dated 12/06/2001, the action claims Radware and certain of its officers violated the US federal securities laws by issuing and selling Radware common stock pursuant to Radware's IPO and a secondary offering without disclosing to investors that several of the underwriters of the Radware IPO had received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors. The complaint alleges that in exchange for the excessive commissions, the underwriters allocated shares to certain investors at the IPO price of $18 per share. In order to purchase the shares at $18, the underwriters' customers had to agree to purchase further shares in the aftermarket at progressively higher prices. The practice, known in Wall Street as 'laddering,' drove Radware's share price up to artificially high levels, giving both the underwriters and their customers enormous profits. During the first day of trading alone the share price rose as high as $49 from the $18 IPO price. In early trading yesterday Radware was at $11.18, 49.6% lower compared to the year earlier. The underwriters involved include Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., US Bancorp Piper Jaffray, Inc., Bank of America Corporation (Banc of America Securities LLC), FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc. (SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Capital Markets).

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code:  7389
Sector:  Technology
Industry: Computer Hardware


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Radware Ltd.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: RDWR
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.radware.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Abraham Kassin, et al. v. Radware Ltd., et al.
 COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 
 JUDGE NAME: Shira A. Scheindlin
 DATE FILED: 12/06/2001  SOURCE: Business Wires
 CLASS PERIOD START: 09/29/1999  CLASS PERIOD END: 12/06/2000
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Lovell Stewart Halebian LLP
       500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10110
       (voice) 212.608.1900, (fax) 212.719.4677, info@lshllp.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1


  • REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In Re Radware Ltd. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation
     COURT: S.D. New York  DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-10898
     JUDGE NAME: 
     DATE FILED: 04/19/2002  SOURCE: Business Wires
     CLASS PERIOD START: 09/30/1999  CLASS PERIOD END: 12/06/2000
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz LLP (New York, NY)
       10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 800.217.1522, (fax) , info@bernlieb.com
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, LLP (New York, NY)
       One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10119-1065
       (voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) ,
  • Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP
       3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
       (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com
  • Sirota & Sirota, LLP
       110 Wall Street 21st Floor, New York, NY, 10005
       (voice) 888.759.2990, (fax) 212.425.9093, Info@SirotaLaw.com
  • Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
       6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
       (voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
  • Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz LLP
       270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  6

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/19/2002

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top