| |
pcOrder.com, Inc.
Summary: According to a Press Release dated 11/30/2001, the lawsuit asserts claims under Section 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated by the SEC thereunder and seeks to recover damages. The complaint alleges that pcOrder and certain of its officers at the time of its IPO violated the federal securities laws by issuing and selling pcOrder common stock pursuant to pcOrder's initial public offering and a secondary offering of pcOrder stock without disclosing to investors that several of the underwriters of the pcOrder IPO had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors. The complaint also alleges that pcOrder and the defendant underwriters of the secondary offering of pcOrder stock, were able to price the secondary offering at an artificially high $53.3125 per share due to the continued effects of the foregoing violations. The complaint further alleges that defendants violated the Securities Act of 1933 because the Prospectuses distributed to investors and the Registration Statements filed with the SEC in order to gain regulatory approval for the pcOrder offerings contained material misstatements regarding the commissions that the underwriters would derive from the IPO and failed to disclose the additional commissions and "laddering" scheme discussed above.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 5734
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
|
COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: |
pcOrder.com, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: |
PCOR [DELISTED] |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: |
http://www.pcOrder.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE |
| Kassin, et al. v. pcOrder, Inc., et al. |
| COURT: S.D. New York | DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-10828 |
| JUDGE NAME: Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin |
| DATE FILED: 11/30/2001 | SOURCE: Business Wires | | CLASS PERIOD START: 02/25/1999 | CLASS PERIOD END: 12/06/2000 | | TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated | | PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE: |
Lovell Stewart Halebian LLP 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10110
(voice) 212.608.1900, (fax) 212.719.4677, info@lshllp.com
_____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1 | | | DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | | | | Type: | Date on the document: | REFERENCE COMPLAINT | | In re Pcorder, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation | | COURT: S.D. New York | DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-10828 | | JUDGE NAME: Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin | | DATE FILED: 04/19/2002 | SOURCE: Business Wires | | CLASS PERIOD START: 02/25/1999 | CLASS PERIOD END: 12/06/2000 | | TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended | | PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT: |
Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz LLP (New York, NY) 10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016
(voice) 800.217.1522, (fax) , info@bernlieb.com
Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY) One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10119-1065
(voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) ,
Schiffrin & Barroway LLP 3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004
(voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com
Sirota & Sirota LLP 110 Wall Street 21st Floor, New York, NY, 10005
(voice) 888.759.2990, (fax) 212.425.9093, Info@SirotaLaw.com
Stull, Stull & Brody (New York) 6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
(voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016
(voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com
_____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 6 | | | OTHER DOCUMENTS | | |
| Case Name and/or Number: |
| Type: | Date on the document: | WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top
|