Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. - Securities Class Action

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Silicon Storage Technology, Inc. Conclusion: According to the docket, on November 28, 2001, the Court entered the Stipulation and Order by U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel dismissing the case.

The complaint alleges claim against the company for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, insider trading, securities fraud, and unfair business practices. Plaintiff claims that the company knew of financial problems that would lead to a delay of its earnings report, but didn't disclose this information to the public on a timely basis, while insiders took advantage of this knowledge to sell their stock before the information was made public.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3674
Sector: Technology
Industry: Semiconductors

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Silicon Storage Technology, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	SSTI
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.ssti.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

Jay Chavetz, et al. v. Silicon Storage Technlogy, Inc., et al.

COURT: N.D. California	DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-20844
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Jeremy Fogel
DATE FILED: 1/25/2001	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 1/17/2001	CLASS PERIOD END: 1/24/2001
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Jay Chafetz 2033 N. Main Street, Suite 750, Walnut Creek, CA, 94596 (voice) 925.933.5890, (fax) , _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Complaint for Intentional Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Promissory Fraud, Violations of Securities Laws, Insider Trading, and Negligence
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 01/25/2001
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 11/29/2001

OTHER DOCUMENTS

Case Name and/or Number:
Type:		Date on the document:

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�