Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


PSS World Medical
Conclusion: According to a press release dated June 19, 2004, U.S. District Judge John Moore II of Jacksonville approved the company's $6.75 million settlement, resolving nine consolidated securities-fraud suits. PSS World Medical officials said earlier that insurance would cover about $6.5 million of the settlement.

The Complaint alleges that defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market between October 26, 1999 and September 1, 2000, thereby artificially inflating the price of PSSI securities. Throughout the class period, defendants issued multiple press releases and filed quarterly reports and an annual report with the Securities and Exchange Commission which materially overstated the Company's net income in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. On June 22, 2000, Defendants issued a press release announcing its year end results and the fact that it had entered into a definitive stock-for-stock merger agreement with Fisher Scientific International, Inc. (``Fisher''). The market reacted favorably to this announcement because of the value of the exchange ratio of Fisher's shares. One of the key terms of the merger, which was belatedly disclosed by the Company, was that the Company had to report EBITDA of not less than $23 million for the quarter in order for the merger to be consummated. In an August 8, 2000 press release, defendants announced that they were in compliance with this provision of the merger agreement and that the merger was expected to proceed. On September 1, 2000, the Company issued a press release reporting that the merger agreement had been terminated. In response to this announcement, the market reevaluated the true value of PSSI's shares, which had been buoyed by the potential exchange value of Fisher's stock during the Class Period, and, accordingly, shares of PSSI's stock, which had closed at $6 3/8 prior to announcement of the merger termination, closed at $4 13/16 on an inordinate volume of 5,730,200 shares upon dissemination of the news. As the sell-off continued, the price of the Company's stock settled into the range of approximately $2 3/4 - $3 3/4. While Fisher had abandoned the merger because of the results of its own due diligence review of the Company's books and records, the public only became aware of the truth on June 27, 2001. On that date, PSSI filed its Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2001 with the SEC and disclosed, for the first time, the fact that the Company's internal controls over inventory, accounts payable, sales, and accounts receivable were, at all relevant times, materially deficient and that the Company had previously issued financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 which were materially misleading. As a result of these problems, the Company would be forced to restate its previous financial data, and would also cause the Company's EBITDA to be reduced, below the threshold that would have allowed the merger to be completed.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 5047
Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Medical Equipment & Supplies


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: PSS World Medical
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: PSSI
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.pssd.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Bordeaux, et al. v. PSS World Medical, et al.
 COURT: M.D. Florida  DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-00795
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. John H. Moore II
 DATE FILED: 07/13/2001  SOURCE: Business Wires
 CLASS PERIOD START: 10/26/1999  CLASS PERIOD END: 09/01/2000
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Beatie & Osborne LLP
      599 Lexington Avenue, 42nd Floor, New York, NY, 10022
       (voice) 800.891.6305, (fax) ,
  • Berger & Montague, P.C.
      1622 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103
       (voice) 800.424.6690, (fax) 215.875.4604, investorprotect@bm.net
  • Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo (CA)
      425 California Street, Suite 2025, San Francisco, CA, 94104
       (voice) 415.433.3200, (fax) 415.433.6382,
  • Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz LLP (New York, NY)
      10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 800.217.1522, (fax) , info@bernlieb.com
  • Bull & Lifshitz
      18 East 41st St., New York, NY, 10017
       (voice) 212.213.6222, (fax) 212.213.9405,
  • Fruchter & Twersky
      60 East 42 Street, New York, NY, 10021
       (voice) 212.687.6655, (fax) ,
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA)
      600 West Broadway, 1800 One America Plaza, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 800.449.4900, (fax) , support@milberg.com
  • Pomerantz,Haudek, Block, Grossman & Gross
      100 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY, 10017-5516ven
       (voice) 212.661.1100, (fax) 212.661.8665,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  8

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 07/13/2001

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In Re: PSS World Medical Securities Litigation
     COURT: M.D. Florida  DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-00795
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. John H. Moore II
     DATE FILED: 03/22/2002  SOURCE: Business Wires
     CLASS PERIOD START: 10/26/1999  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/03/2000
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (New York, NY)
      805 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10022
       (voice) 212.687.1980, (fax) 212.687.7714, info@kaplanfox.com
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY)
      One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10119-1065
       (voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Law
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/22/2002
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 06/03/2005

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top