 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
iPrint.com, Inc. Summary: According to the Company’s FORM 10-Q For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2002, starting on June 15, 2001, several stockholder class action complaints were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against iPrint, two of our former officers and/or directors, and several investment banking firms that served as underwriters of our March 2000 initial public offering. The cases, which were brought purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased our common stock between March 7, 2000 and December 6, 2000, have been consolidated. Plaintiffs electronically served an amended complaint on or about April 19, 2002. The Company is aware that similar allegations have been made in lawsuits relating to more than 300 other initial public offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000. Those cases have been consolidated for pretrial purposes. Defendants’ time to respond to the complaints has been stayed pending a plan for further coordination.
The complaint charges defendants with violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder) and Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, for issuing a Registration Statement and Prospectus (the "Prospectus") that contained material misrepresentations and/or omissions. The Prospectus was issued in connection with the iPrint IPO. The complaint alleges that the Prospectus was false and misleading because it failed to disclose (i) the Underwriter Defendants agreement with certain investors to provide them with significant amounts of restricted iPrint shares in the IPO in exchange for exorbitant and undisclosed commissions; and (ii) the agreement between the Underwriter Defendants and certain of its customers whereby the Underwriter Defendants would allocate shares in the IPO to those customers in exchange for the customers' agreement to purchase iPrint shares in the after-market at pre-determined prices.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7389
Sector: Services
Industry: Printing Services
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | iPrint.com, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | IPRT |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www101.iprint.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Abraham Garfinkel, et al. v. iPrint.com, Inc., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Type: | Date on the document: | ||
| REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| In Re iPrint Technologies, Inc.(f/k/a iPrint.com, Inc.) Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||
| Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 04/19/2002 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 08/13/2003 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: | |||
| Type: | Date on the document: | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top