Autoweb.com, Inc. - Securities Class Action

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Autoweb.com, Inc. Conclusion: In December 2006, the appellate court overturned the certification of classes in the six test cases that were selected by the underwriter defendants and plaintiffs in the coordinated proceedings. Because class certification was a condition of the settlement, it was unlikely that the settlement would receive final Court approval. On June 25, 2007, the Court entered an order terminating the proposed settlement based upon a stipulation among the parties to the settlement. Plaintiffs have filed an amended complaint and filed a motion for class certification based on their amended allegations. It is uncertain whether there will be any revised or future settlement.

According to the Company’s FORM 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001, between April and June 2001, eight purported class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York against certain of Autoweb's current and former directors and officers and underwriters involved in Autoweb's initial public offering. The foregoing actions purport to allege violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The enumerated complaints have only recently been filed. Two motions seeking lead counsel status were filed on June 19, 2001. Autoweb anticipates that all actions, except for possibly one separate lawsuit, will ultimately be consolidated into one action and that a consolidated complaint will be filed after appointment of lead plaintiff(s). All of the cases have been assigned to one judge in the Southern District of New York. As of July 13, 2001 Autoweb and the other defendants had not yet answered any of the complaints listed above, and discovery had not yet commenced. Autoweb believes that it has meritorious defenses to the complaints and intends to vigorously defend the actions. In addition, Autoweb believes that its underwriters may have an obligation to indemnify Autoweb against these claims under the terms of the underwriter engagement letter for the initial public offering.

The complaint alleges that defendants violated the federal securities laws by issuing and selling Autoweb.com common stock pursuant to the IPO without disclosing to investors that some of the underwriters in the offering, including the lead underwriters, had solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors. The complaint alleges that, in exchange for the excessive commissions, lead underwriters Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation and BancBoston Robertson Stephens, Inc., together with underwriters Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., Incorporated and Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. allocated Autoweb.com shares to customers at the IPO price of $14.00 per share. To receive the allocations (i.e., the ability to purchase shares) at $14.00, the underwriters' brokerage customers had to agree to purchase additional shares in the aftermarket at progressively higher prices. The requirement that customers make additional purchases at progressively higher prices as the price of Autoweb.com stock rocketed upward (a practice known on Wall Street as "laddering") was intended to (and did) drive Autoweb.com's share price up to artificially high levels. This artificial price inflation, the complaint alleges, enabled both the underwriters and their customers to reap enormous profits by buying stock at the $14.00 IPO price and then selling it later for a profit at inflated aftermarket prices, which rose as high as $41.00 during its first day of trading. The complaint further alleges that defendants violated the Securities Act of 1933 because the Prospectus distributed to investors and the Registration Statement filed with the SEC in order to gain regulatory approval for the Autoweb.com offering contained material misstatement regarding the commissions that the underwriters would derive from the IPO transaction and failed to disclose the additional commissions and "laddering" scheme discussed above.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7500
Sector: Services
Industry: Retail & Repair (Automotive)

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Autoweb.com, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	AWEB
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.autoweb.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

McKay, et al. v. Autoweb.com, Inc., et al.

COURT: S.D. New York	DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-3360
JUDGE NAME: Hon. George B. Daniels
DATE FILED: 04/20/2001	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/22/1999	CLASS PERIOD END: 04/18/2001
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
Lovell Stewart Halebian LLP 500 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10110 (voice) 212.608.1900, (fax) 212.719.4677, info@lshllp.com Sirota & Sirota LLP 110 Wall Street 21st Floor, New York, NY, 10005 (voice) 888.759.2990, (fax) 212.425.9093, Info@SirotaLaw.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 2

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Class Action Complaint
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 04/19/2001

REFERENCE COMPLAINT

In Re Autoweb.Com, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation

COURT: S.D. New York	DOCKET NUMBER: 01-CV-3360
JUDGE NAME: Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin
DATE FILED: 04/19/2002	SOURCE: Business Wires
CLASS PERIOD START: 03/23/1999	CLASS PERIOD END: 12/06/2000
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz LLP (New York, NY) 10 E. 40th Street, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10016 (voice) 800.217.1522, (fax) , info@bernlieb.com Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (New York, NY) One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10119-1065 (voice) 212.594.5300, (fax) , Schiffrin & Barroway LLP 3 Bala Plaza E, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 19004 (voice) 610.667.7706, (fax) 610.667.7056, info@sbclasslaw.com Sirota & Sirota LLP 110 Wall Street 21st Floor, New York, NY, 10005 (voice) 888.759.2990, (fax) 212.425.9093, Info@SirotaLaw.com Stull, Stull & Brody (New York) 6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017 (voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016 (voice) 212.545.4600, (fax) 212.686.0114, newyork@whafh.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 6

DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 04/19/2002
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 01/20/2005
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 06/28/2007

OTHER DOCUMENTS
Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
Case Name and/or Number: Fernandez, et al. v. Autoweb.com, Inc., et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 05/09/2001

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�