 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Imperial Credit Commercial Mortgage Investment Corporation Conclusion: On April 5, 2002, the Court entered the Stipulation and Order for Dismissal with prejudice as to the plaintiff’s individual claims. According to the Order by U.S. District Judge Audrey B. Collins, this action is dismissed with prejudice as to plaintiff John Huston's individual claims, with all parties to bear their own costs & attorney’s fees. Further, as no class has been certified, this action is dismissed without prejudice as to the claims of class members other than plaintiff John Huston.
According to a Press Release dated June 7, 2000, a class action was filed alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933. In denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and permitting Plaintiff to Proceed against ICCMIC and certain of its directors, the Court said, 'The Prospectus is a part of the Registration Statement and the Prospectus fails to describe that ICCMIC must pay for the Manager's operating expenses'. ICCMIC filed a Registration Statement and Prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about August 1, 1997. The complaint alleges that Prospectus contained false statements, including a variety of false Statements related to the compensation paid to a management entity hired to operate the investment fund and undisclosed conflicts of interest.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6798
Sector: Financial
Industry: Investment Services
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Imperial Credit Commercial Mortgage Investment Corporation |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | ICMI |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| John Huston, et al. v. Imperial Credit Commercial Mortgage Investment Corporation, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Class Action Complaint For Violations Of Federal Securities Law And Unfair Business Practices – Demand For Jury Trial | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 03/17/2000 | ||
| Civil Minutes - General | |||
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 03/18/2002 | ||
| Civil Minutes - General | |||
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 04/01/2002 | ||
| Civil Minutes - Reopening/Closing | |||
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 05/23/2002 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 05/23/2002 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: | |||
| Type: | Date on the document: | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top