 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
SyQuest Technology, Inc. Conclusion: According to the docket, on February 2, 1999, the Court entered the Minutes on the Counsel’s Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without Prejudice. That same day, U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker dismissed the action with prejudice.
The complaint charges SyQuest and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making misrepresentations about SyQuest's business, operations, new products, earnings growth and financial statements and SyQuest's ability to continue to achieve profitable growth. The complaint alleges that by issuing these false and misleading statements, defendants artificially inflated SyQuest's stock price to a Class Period high of $19-5/8 in July-August 1995, allowing SyQuest's top insiders to sell 325,398 shares of their SyQuest stock at as high as $19 per share, for almost $4.9 million, before the true facts about SyQuest's troubled operations, diminished profitability, false financial statements and products failures were revealed and SyQuest's stock collapsed to as low as $4-7/8 per share.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3572
Sector: Technology
Industry: Computer Storage Devices
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | SyQuest Technology, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | SYQT |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.syquest.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Irving Ravens, et al. v. SyQuest Technology, Inc., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Class Action Complaint | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 04/02/1996 | ||
| Order Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion To Be Appointed Lead | |||
| Type: Order | Date on the document: 01/07/1997 | ||
| Order Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion To Be Appointed Lead | |||
| Type: Order | Date on the document: 07/16/1997 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 08/29/1997 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 02/04/1999 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Warner Bros, et al, et al v. Ghadieh, et al | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 9/13/1996 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Vito Bellezza, et al. v. Syed H. Iftikar, et al. | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 02/04/1999 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top