 |
||
|
|
Home Annual/Quarterly
Updates About
Us
|
Olympic Financial, Ltd. Conclusion: According to the court docket, the court entered its Final Judgment and Order approving the settlement and dismissing the claims on 10/11/2001.
According to the Notice of Proposed Settlement dated 7/21/2001, the parties agreed to settle the case for $6,125,000 in cash, pending final court approval.
According to a PR Newswire press release, the complaint alleges that Olympic, and certain of its officers and directors, violated sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, by, among other things, making false and misleading statements and omissions about the company's loan programs, its retail repossession program, and the adequacy of the company's loan loss reserves. In particular, the company is alleged to have failed to disclose material information regarding the fact that its loan portfolio had deteriorated significantly due to the rapid increase in high risk, sub-prime loans in connection with its 'Classic' loan program and its retailing and refinancing of repossessed vehicles, and that the company's loan loss reserves were materially insufficient to protect the company from increases in delinquencies and repossessions resulting from these programs. The PR Newswire account notes that the complaint alleges that during the class period Olympic common stock traded at artificially inflated prices as high as $30 5/8 per share.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6411
Sector: Financial
Industry: Insurance (Miscellaneous)
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Olympic Financial |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | OLM |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.olympicfinance.qpg.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Taran, et al. v. Olympic Financial, Ltd., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
|
REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| In Re Olympic Financial, LTD. Securities Litigation | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 06/08/2000 | ||
| Notice Of Pendency Of Class Action, Proposed Settlement Of Class Action, And Settlement Approval Hearing | |||
| Type: Settlement | Date on the document: 07/27/2001 | ||
| US District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 10/05/2001 | ||
| Proof of Claim and Release | |||
| Type: Settlement | Date on the document: 12/15/2001 | ||
| Memorandum Opinion and Order [denying motion to dismiss] | |||
| Type: Order | Date on the document: 09/10/1998 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top