 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. Conclusion: According to the most recent docket posted on the site, on June 24, 2002 and January 22, 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed three, separate appeals with prejudice filed previously by Plaintiffs, defendant Splash Technology and certain Individual Defendants, and the third filed by one Individual Defendant and Radius Inc.
On August 29, 2001, the Court entered two Orders by U.S. District Judge Saundra B. Armstrong granting motions by defendants to dismiss the second amended complaint with prejudice. Three Notice of Appeals were then filed by the Plaintiffs and the Defendants.
The original complaint charges Splash, certain of its officers and directors, its lead underwriters, two venture capital firms and Radius, Inc. with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaint alleges that in order to inflate the price of Splash stock, while concealing the adverse conditions which Defendants knew were already impacting Splash's business, Defendants falsely represented that demand for all of Splash's products was strong, Splash occupied a unique market position characterized by accelerating market demand, Splash's financial results were indicative of continued strong product demand, there was very strong demand for Splash print servers in Asia, Splash's growth rate would be fueled beyond the industry's growth rate of 35% and Splash could grow revenue and earnings 35%-50% with substantial upside as it gains market share.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3577
Sector: Technology
Industry: Communications Equipment
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | SPLH |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.splashtech.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Clarence F. Scott, et al. v. Splash Technology Holdings, Inc., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| In Re: Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Libros v. Splash Tech Holdings, et al | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 01/28/1999 | ||
| Notice of Entry of Related Case Order | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Libros, et al. v. Splash Technology Holdings, Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Notice | Date on the document: 03/05/1999 | ||
| CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 99-CV-461 | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Libros v. Splash Tech Holdings, et al | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 05/04/1999 | ||
| Litigants | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Libros v. Splash Tech Holdings, et al | |||
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 05/04/1999 | ||
| U.S. Court of Appeals Docket | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Clarence F. Scott, et al. v. Splash Technology Holdings, Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 07/14/2003 | ||
| U.S. Court of Appeals Docket [cross-appeal] | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Clarence F. Scott, et al. v. Splash Technology Holdings, Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 07/14/2003 | ||
| U.S. Court of Appeals Docket [cross-appeal] | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Clarence F. Scott, et al. v. Splash Technology Holdings, Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 04/04/2005 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top