US Court of Appeals docket as 06/15/1999
Retrieved from the court of Thursday, September 14, 2006

 Court of Appeals Docket #: 97-16005                          Filed: 6/10/97
 Nsuit: 3850  SEC (Fed)
 Erickson v. Wheatley Ventures, et al
 Appeal from: Northern District of California (San Francisco)

 Lower court information:
      District: 0971-3 : CV-96-02934-MHP
      presiding judge: Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge


 8/21/97          14 day oral extension by phone of time to file Appellee
                  Wheatley Ventures's brief.  [97-16005] appellees' brief due
                  9/10/97;                the optional reply brief is due 14
                  days from service of the answering brief. (cg)
 
 9/8/97           Filed Montgomery Realty, Fox Realty motion to extend time
                  to file appellee's brief [97-16005]  served on 9/8/97
                  [3304891] (crw)
 
 9/8/97           Filed Northern Trust Bank motion to extend time to file
                  appellee's brief until  9/17/97 [97-16005]  served on
                  9/8/97 [3304897] (crw)
 
 9/17/97          Filed order (Appellate Commissioner) The court is in
                  receipt of aples second request for an extension of time to
                  file the answering brief........Nonetheless, in the
                  interest of justice, the mtn is granted; the answering
                  brief is now due 9/17/97. The court does, however expect
                  csl to request telephonic extensions only when csl
                  anticipates that the brief will in fact be filied within 14
                  days. The optional reply brief is due 14 days from service
                  of the answering brief. [3304891-1]  ( PROMO)  [97-16005]
                  (crw)
 
 9/30/97          Filed motion and deputy clerk order :(Deputy Clerk: cag)
                  Aplts mtn for a stay of proceedings pending settlement
                  negotiations is granted. This appeal is stayed until
                  12/8/97. Wtihin 7 days after expiration of the stay, aplt
                  shall submit a status report and mtn for appropriate relief
                  or aple may file the answering brief. The optional reply
                  brief is duye 14 days from service of the answering brief.
                  If the parties do not comply with this order this appeal
                  will be deemed ready for calendaring. [3313059-1]  (
                  Motion recvd 9/17/97) [97-16005] (crw)
 
 12/19/97         Filed stip and order (Deputy Clerk, cag) The parties have
                  stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal with prejudice
                  under FRAP 42(b). The appeal is dismissed without aplt
                  costs or aplt attys fees to any party.  A copy of this
                  order shall act as and for the mandate of this court.  (
                  Procedurally Terminated Without Judicial Action; F.R.A.P.
                  42. )  [97-16005] (crw)
 
 6/15/99          NO ORIGINAL RECORD (ben)
 

Note: Links in this docket are stored in the PACER system (Public Access to Court Electronic Records). PACER is a service of United States Judiciary. To view and retrieve the linked documents from PACER you must be a registered user. To register, fill out one of the registration forms available on the PACER site. The United States Congress has given the Judicial Conference of the United States, the judicial governing body of the U.S. Federal Courts, authority to impose user fees for electronic access to case information. For more information visit the PACER site at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/pacerdesc.html