 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Alliance Semiconductor Corporation Summary: According to Alliance Semiconductor's SEC 10-Q filing for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2000, in August 2000, the parties settled the litigation and the suit was dismissed.
According to the same filing, in April 1997, the Court dismissed the complaint, with leave to file an amended complaint. In June 1997, plaintiff filed an amended complaint against the Company and certain of its officers and directors alleging violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. In July 1997, the Company moved to dismiss the amended complaint. In March 1998, the court ruled in defendants' favor as to all claims but one, and dismissed all but one claim with prejudice. In April 1998, defendants requested reconsideration of the ruling as to the one claim not dismissed. In June 1998, the parties stipulated to dismiss the remaining claim without prejudice, on the condition that in the event the dismissal with prejudice of the other claims is affirmed in its entirety, such remaining claim shall be deemed dismissed with prejudice. In June 1998, the court entered judgment dismissing the case pursuant to the parties' stipulation. Plaintiffs appealed the court's ruling dismissing the claims.
This is a class action on behalf of all persons who purchased the common stock of Alliance Semiconductor Corp. ("Alliance" or the "Company") between July 11, 1995 and December 29, 1995 (the "Class Period"), complaining of a fraudulent scheme and course of business that operated as a fraud or deceit on purchasers of Alliance common stock due to defendants' false and misleading statements about Alliance.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3674
Sector: Technology
Industry: Semiconductors
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Alliance Semiconductor Corporation |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | ALSC |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.alsc.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Robert Hockey, et al. v. Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 03/04/1996 | ||
| REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| Robert Hockey, et al. v. Alliance Semiconductor Corporation, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||
| Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 12/28/1998 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 09/01/2000 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| U.S. Court of Appeals Docket | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Hockey, et al. v. Ajit K. Medhekar, et al. | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 02/09/2001 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top