Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Advanta Corporation
Summary: According to the firm's 10-Q filing for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999, on June 30, 1997, purported shareholders of the Company who are represented by a group of law firms filed a putative class action complaint against the Company and several of its current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. A second, similar complaint was filed in the same court a few days later by a different group of law firms. Both complaints allege that the Company made misrepresentations in certain of its public filings and statements in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaints seek damages of an unspecified amount. On July 10, 1998, the complaints, which had previously been consolidated, were dismissed by the Court for failing to state a claim. The plaintiffs determined not to attempt to amend their complaints. Rather, they appealed the District Court's decision to the United States Courts of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which court, on June 17, 1999, affirmed the District Court.

The Complaint charges Advanta and certain of its officers with violations of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. According to the Complaint, during the Class Period, defendants disseminated numerous announcements concerning the Company's earnings, return on equity, and growth which failed to disclose the fact that the performance of its credit card operations had reversed course. Specifically, Defendants are alleged to have employed a change in accounting methodology to mask and forestall recognition of this trend reversal. The Complaint further alleges that while these problems were concealed from the investing public, during the class period certain officers and directors sold over 890,000 shares of Advanta common stock for proceeds of over $39 million. Plaintiffs claim that upon disclosure of the true condition of the Company's business, the price of Advanta common stock declined over 20% to $31.875 per share, causing substantial losses for Advanta investors during the Class Period. As a result, the price of Advanta common stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 6141
Sector: Financial
Industry: Consumer Financial Services


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Advanta Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: ADVNA
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.advanta.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Poppel, et al. v. Advanta Corporation, et al.
 COURT: E.D. Pennsylvania  DOCKET NUMBER: 97-CV-04343
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Ronald L. Buckwalter
 DATE FILED: 06/30/1997  SOURCE: Complaint
 CLASS PERIOD START: 08/13/1996  CLASS PERIOD END: 03/17/1997
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Bernard M. Gross
      1500 Walnut Street, Suite 600, Philadelphia, PA, 19102
       (voice) 215.561.3600, (fax) 215.561.3000, bmgross@BernardMGross.com
  • Donovan Miller, L.L.C.
      1608 Walnut Street, Suite 1400, Philadelphia, PA, 19103
       (voice) 212732.6020, (fax) , dmlaw@erols.com
  • Pasternak, Feldman & Plutnick, P.A.
      Eisenhower Plaza South, Suite 245, 70 South Orange Avenue, Livingston, NJ, 07039
       (voice) 201.994.0330, (fax) ,
  • Stull, Stull & Brody (New York)
      6 East 45th Street, New York, NY, 10017
       (voice) 310.209.2468, (fax) 310.209.2087, SSBNY@aol.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  4

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/30/1997

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In Re: Advanta Corporation Securities Litigation
     COURT: E.D. Pennsylvania  DOCKET NUMBER: 97-CV-04343
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Ronald L. Buckwalter
     DATE FILED: 12/17/1997  SOURCE: Business Wires
     CLASS PERIOD START: 08/13/1996  CLASS PERIOD END: 03/17/1997
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Bernard M. Gross
      1500 Walnut Street, Suite 600, Philadelphia, PA, 19102
       (voice) 215.561.3600, (fax) 215.561.3000, bmgross@BernardMGross.com
  • Faruqi & Faruqi LLP
      320 East 39th Street, New York, NY, 10016
       (voice) 212.983.9330, (fax) 212.983.9331, Nfaruqi@faruqilaw.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 09/11/2000

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Case Name and/or Number: 
    Type:  Date on the document: 

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top