Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Raster Graphics, Inc.
Conclusion: According to a press release dated March 5, 1999, Raster Graphics (Pink Sheets: RGFX) today announced the final judicial approval of the settlement of certain class action lawsuits, which were pending against the Company since March 1998. The lawsuits alleged that the Company and several of its officers and directors violated federal securities laws. Judicial approval of the settlement of these lawsuits is a condition to the proposed merger between Raster Graphics and Gretag Imaging Group, Inc., a leading provider of imaging and photofinishing equipment.

The Final Judgement and Order of Dismissal was granted by the United States District Court in the Northern District of California on February 19, 1999. Under the terms of the settlement, the plaintiffs have received $4.5 million, of which Raster Graphics paid $850,000; the remaining $3.65 million has been paid by the Company's insurance carrier. These sums had been previously placed in an escrow account pending approval of the settlement.

As reported by the Company’s Form 10-Q For The Quarter Ended September 30, 1998, on October 1998, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the securities litigation plaintiffs. This MoU contains the essential terms of settlement for the above referenced securities litigation. In consideration for a mutually agreed release, the plaintiffs will receive $4.5 million. Of this amount, the Company has accrued $850,000 as of March 31, 1998, and subsequently paid such amount directly into an escrow account and the balance was paid by the Company's insurance carrier. The settlement is conditioned upon receiving final judicial approval. There can be no assurances such approval will be obtained.

On March 1998, several class action lawsuits were filed in both state and federal courts on purported behalf of shareholders who purchased the Company's stock during various periods in 1997 through early 1998. The complaints allege, among other things, violation of federal securities laws and that defendants made false and misleading statements in press releases, SEC filings and/or other public statements and seek unspecified damages.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3577
Sector: Technology
Industry: Computer Peripherals


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Raster Graphics, Inc.
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: RGFX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.rgi.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Grimm, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc. et al.
 COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-0807
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Fern M. Smith
 DATE FILED: 03/02/1998  SOURCE: Business Wires
 CLASS PERIOD START: 10/20/1997  CLASS PERIOD END: 02/03/1998
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo (CA)
      425 California Street, Suite 2025, San Francisco, CA, 94104
       (voice) 415.433.3200, (fax) 415.433.6382,
  • Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow LLP
      100 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10017
       (voice) 212.907.0700, (fax) 212.818.0477, info@glrslaw.com
  • Hanzman, Criden, Korge, Chaykin, Ponce & Heise, P.A.
      200 S. Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL, 33131
       (voice) , (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaints; Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Thereof [Fed R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), 9(B); Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995]
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 03/02/1998
    Securities Fraud Class Action Complaint
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/02/1998
    Opposition To The Grimm Group's Motion For Designation Of Lead Plaintiff And For Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs' Choice Of Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 03/15/1998
    Declaration Of Nicole Lavallee In Support Of Motion For Consolidation And For Movants To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs And For The Approval Of Lead Plaintiffs' Choice Of Counsel
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 05/01/1998
    Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of The Motion For Consolidation, Designation Of Lead Plaintiffs And For Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs' Choice Of Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 05/01/1998
    Declaration Of Jeffrey W. Lawrence In Support Of Movants' Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To Section 21d(A)(3)(B) And Approval Of Lead Plaintiffs' Choice Of Counsel
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 05/04/1998
    Movants' Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To Section 21d(A)(3)(B) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 And Approval Of Lead Plaintiffs' Choice Of Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 05/04/1998
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-807
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/15/1998
    Litigants
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/15/1998

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In re Raster Graphics Securities Litigation
     COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-0807
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Fern M. Smith
     DATE FILED:   SOURCE: Business Wires
     CLASS PERIOD START: 10/20/1997  CLASS PERIOD END: 02/03/1998
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Consolidated and/or Amended
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer, LLP (New York, NY)
      805 Third Avenue, 22nd Floor, New York, NY, 10022
       (voice) 212.687.1980, (fax) 212.687.7714, info@kaplanfox.com
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA)
      600 West Broadway, 1800 One America Plaza, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 800.449.4900, (fax) , support@milberg.com
  • Wolf Popper, LLP
      845 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022-6689Ave
       (voice) 877.370.7703, (fax) 212.486.2093, IRRep@wolfpopper.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  3

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Notice Of Pendency And Proposed Settlement Of Class Actions
    Type: Settlement Date on the document: 12/11/1998
    Declaration Of Joy Ann Bull In Support Of Application For Award Of Attorneys' Fees And Reimbursement Of Expenses
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 02/11/1999
    Declaration Of Reed R. Kathrein In Support Of Plaintiffs' Application For (1) Approval Of Settlement, (2) An Award Of Attorneys' Fees And Reimbursement Of Expenses, And (3) Approval Of Plan Of Allocation
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 02/11/1999
    Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal
    Type: Order Date on the document: 02/11/1999
    Notice Of Motion And Motion And Memorandum In Support Of Motion For Approval Of Plan Of Allocation
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 02/11/1999
    Notice Of Motion And Motion And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion For Final Approval Of Settlement
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 02/11/1999
    Notice Of Motion And Motion And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Plaintiffs' Application For Attorneys' Fees And Reimbursement Of Expenses
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 02/11/1999
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 02/24/1999

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Securities Fraud Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Dowgos v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/10/1998
    Opposition To The Grimm Group's Motion For Designation Of Lead Plaintiff And For Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs' Choice Of Counsel
    Case Name and/or Number: Moore, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 03/15/1998
    Securities Fraud Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Moore, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/13/1998
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of Cal. Corp. Code §§ 25400 and 25500
    Case Name and/or Number: Beashear, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/14/1998
    Declaration Of Jeffrey W. Lawrence In Support Of Movants' Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To Section 21d(A)(3)(B)
    Case Name and/or Number: Moore, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 05/04/1998
    Movants' Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To Section 21d(A)(3)(B) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 And Approval Of Lead Plaintiffs' Choice Of Counsel
    Case Name and/or Number: Moore, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 05/04/1998
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-938
    Case Name and/or Number: Dowgos v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 06/08/1998
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Dowgos v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Other Date on the document: 06/08/1998
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-1489
    Case Name and/or Number: Moore, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/09/1998
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Moore, et al. v. Raster Graphics, Inc., et al.
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/09/1998

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top