Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Informix Corporation
Conclusion: According to the firm's 10-K dated 3/23/2001, on May 26, 1999, the firm entered into a memorandum of understanding regarding the settlement of pending private securities and related litigation against it, including a federal class action, a derivative action, and a state class action. In November 1999, the settlement was approved by the applicable Federal and state courts.

The settlement resolves all material litigation arising out of the restatement of its financial statements that was publicly announced in November 1997. In accordance with the terms of the memorandum of understanding, the firm paid approximately $3.2 million in cash during the second quarter of 1999 and an additional amount of approximately $13.8 million of insurance proceeds was contributed directly by certain of our insurance carriers on behalf of certain of our current and former officers and directors. The firm will also issue a minimum of nine million shares of our common stock, which will have a guaranteed value of $91 million for a maximum term of one year from the date of final approval of the settlement by the courts. The firm's former independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, have paid $34 million in cash. The total amount of the settlement will be $142 million. As of December 31, 2000, the firm had issued 2.9 million of the minimum amount of 9 million shares issuable pursuant to the memorandum of understanding.

The original complaint alleges that defendants Informix, its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Technology Officer violated the federal securities laws by issuing to the investing public false and misleading statements regarding Informix current operations and future prospects. The complaint alleges that, as a result of these misrepresentations, Informix's common stock price was artificially inflated during the Class Period. The complaint further alleges that defendants participated in a scheme to artificially inflate Informix's common stock price, for among other reasons, to allow Informix’s Chief Technology Officer to sell 87,500 shares of his personal Informix common stock holdings, reaping proceeds of over $1.635 million. Specifically, the complaint alleges that starting on Dec. 2, 1997 and continuing through April 1, 1997, defendants issued public statements about Informix's business that omitted to state certain material adverse facts about its current operations and its business prospects for the first quarter of fiscal year 1997 (period ended 3/31/97). Specifically, starting on Dec. 2 and 3, 1996 when Informix announced the commercial availability of its new software product the Universal Server, defendants represented that the Universal Server would drive existing product sales and that Informix had a clear technological lead over its competitors. Defendants failed to disclose in those December 1996 statements that sales of existing products were declining sharply due to, among other reasons, Informix's management focus on the release of the Universal Server, that the Universal Server technology was currently of limited value to customers and that Informix's sales of existing products were being adversely affected by a reorganization of its sales force and the massive hiring of new sales representatives. Despite such adverse facts, Informix informed the investing public that the Company would achieve revenues in excess of $200 million and earnings of between $0.11-$0.16 per share in the first quarter of fiscal year 1997. The compliant alleges that, as a result of Informix's announcement on April 1, 1997, that revenues would be sharply lower and Informix would report a substantial loss in the first quarter, its common stock price fell in a single day by over $6 per share on huge trading volume.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7372
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Informix Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: IFMX
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.informix.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
Weaver, et al. v. Informix Corporation, et al.
 COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 97-CV-01289
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Saundra B. Armstrong
 DATE FILED: 04/11/1997  SOURCE: Business Wires
 CLASS PERIOD START: 12/02/1996  CLASS PERIOD END: 04/01/1997
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP
      595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94105-2835sco
       (voice) 800.778.1822, (fax) 415.777.5189, info@gbcsf.com
  • Smith, MacKinnon, Harris, Greeley, Bowdin & Edwards
      225 South Orange Ave. Ste. 800, Firstate Tower, PO Box 2254 , Orlando, FL, 32802-7300
       (voice) 407.843.7300, (fax) ,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/11/1997
    Declaration of Mark Solomon in Support of the Foltys Group's Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant to §21d(A)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 And For Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 06/11/1997
    The Foltys Group's Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Cases for All Purposes
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 06/11/1997
    The Foltys Group's Notice of Motion and Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant to §21d(A)(3)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and For Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 06/12/1997
    The Foltys Group's Notice Of Motion And Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To &Sect;21d(A)(3)(B) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 and For Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 06/12/1997
    Declaration of George S. Trevor in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs, Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel and Consolidation of All Related Actions
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 06/13/1997
    Declaration of Joseph M. Barton in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs, Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel and Consolidation of All Related Actions
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 06/13/1997
    Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs, Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel and Consolidation of All Related Actions
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 06/13/1997
    Weaver Plaintiffs' Opposition To Foltys Group's Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To §21D(a)(3)(B) Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 And For Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 06/13/1997
    The Foltys Group's Response To The Weaver Group's Request For Consolidation Of Actions
    Type: Other Date on the document: 08/25/1997
    Declaration of James I. Jaconette in Opposition to the Weaver Group's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 08/26/1997
    Robert And Eliska Westerlund's Notice Of Joinder And Joinder In The Foltys Group's Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To §21D(a)(3)(B) Of The Securities Act Of 1934 And For Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 08/26/1997
    The Foltys Group's Opposition to the Weaver Group's Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 08/26/1997
    Declaration of Dale Gordon
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 09/02/1997
    The Foltys Group's Reply in Support of Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/02/1997
    Weaver Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs and Appointment of Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/02/1997
    Order Denying Foltys Group's Motion For Expedited Discovery Relating To Its Motion For Preliminary Injunction And Denying Foltys Group's Motion For Order Shortening Time For Notice Of Motion For Preliminary Injunction
    Type: Order Date on the document: 09/05/1997
    Foltys Group's Reply To Opposition Of Teachers' Retirement System Of Louisiana And State Board Of Administration Of Florida To Motions For The Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs And Lead Counsel
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/12/1997
    Alan Bartelheimer's Notice Of Joinder And Joinder In The Foltys Group's Motion To Be Appointed Lead Plaintiffs Pursuant To §21D(a)(3)(B) Of The Securities Act Of 1934 And For Appointment Of Lead Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 10/07/1997
    Order [re Foltys and Weaver Groups' lead plaintiff and counsel motions]
    Type: Order Date on the document: 10/17/1997

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In Re: Informix Corporation Securities Litigation
     COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 97-CV-01289
     JUDGE NAME: Hon. Charles R. Breyer
     DATE FILED: 01/19/1999  SOURCE: Business Wires
     CLASS PERIOD START: 02/08/1995  CLASS PERIOD END: 11/18/1997
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Second Amended and Consolidated
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Barrack, Rodos & Bacine (Main office, Philadelphia)
      3300 Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19103
       (voice) 215.963.0600, (fax) 215.963.0838, info@barrack.com
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (S.F., CA)
      100 Pine Street - Suite 2600, San Francisco, CA, 94111
       (voice) 415.288.4545, (fax) 415.288.4534,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/06/1998
    Ernst & Young's Notice of Motion and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 06/26/1998
    Howard H. Graham's Motion To Dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 07/09/1998
    Declaration of James I. Jaconette in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 07/17/1998
    Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification and Memorandum of Points and Authorities
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 07/17/1998
    Ernst & Young LLP's Motion To Dismiss Class-Action Complaint
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 07/24/1998
    Ernst & Young LLP's Motion To Preserve and Enforce the Mandatory Discovery Stay
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 07/28/1998
    Opposition To Ernst & Young LLP's Motion to "Preserve and Enforce the Mandatory Discovery Stay"
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 08/28/1998
    Ernst & Young LLP's Motion To Dismiss Amended Class-Action Complaint
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/03/1998
    Ernst & Young's Reply in Support of Motion To Dismiss Consolidated Amended Complaint
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/04/1998
    Ernst & Young's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Its Motion To Preserve and Enforce the Mandatory Discovery Stay
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/04/1998
    Declaration Of James I. Jaconette In Support Of Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To The Motion Of Plaintiffs Williams, Golden, And Morgenthaler Venture Partners III For Certification Of The Class/Subclass Of Former Illustra Securities Holders
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 09/29/1998
    Lead Plaintiffs' Response To The Motion Of The Teachers' Retirement System Of Louisiana And The State Board Of Administration Of Florida To Vacate Or Limit The Consolidation Order In This Case
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/29/1998
    Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To The Motion Of Plaintiffs Williams, Golden, And Morgenthaler Venture Partners III For Certification Of The Class/Subclass Of Former Illustra Securities Holders
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 09/29/1998
    Reply In Support Of Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification And Opposition To The Informix Defendants' Counter Motion To Compel Class Notice
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 10/13/1998
    Plaintiffs' Statement Of Recent Decisions
    Type: Other Date on the document: 10/21/1998
    Second Amended And Consolidated Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/15/1999
    Ernst & Young LLP's Answer to Second Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/12/1999
    Ernst & Young LLP's Motion To Dismiss Counts Six and Seven of the Second Amended Individual and Class Action Complaint
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 02/12/1999
    Notice Of Motion And Motion To Strike Defendants Winder And Blasing's Form 4 Reports With The Securities And Exchange Commission And In Opposition To Winder's Request For Judicial Notice Of Form 4 Filings
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 03/19/1999
    Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Opposition To Blasing's, Winder's, And Alvarez's Motions To Dismiss The Second Amended And Consolidated Class Action Complaint For Violations Of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/19/1999
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-1289
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 05/21/1999
    Litigants
    Type: Other Date on the document: 05/21/1999
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 05/14/2003

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Kremnitzer, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/14/1997
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Case Name and/or Number: Strauss, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/17/1997
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws and for Common Law Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation
    Case Name and/or Number: Respler, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/18/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Valancius, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/21/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Mahler v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/24/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Decampos, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 04/29/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Finkelstein, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/05/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Schroeder, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/07/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Harding, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/13/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Wehr, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/14/1997
    Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Damelio, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/14/1997
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Felzen v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/17/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Anderson v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/20/1997
    Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Qazi v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 05/21/1997
    Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Ruden & Cramer Profit Sharing Plan Dated 7/1/75 F/B/O Martin R. Cramer, Trustee, et al. v. Informix Corporation, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/02/1997
    Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Gitlin, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/10/1997
    Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws and for Common Law Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation
    Case Name and/or Number: Boyd, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/18/1997
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Westerlund, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 06/26/1997
    Complaint for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Britton v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 08/13/1997
    First Amended Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Qazi v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 08/19/1997
    Notice To Preserve Documents Pursuant to Local Rule 16-1(g)(4)
    Case Name and/or Number: Qazi v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 08/19/1997
    First Amended Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Kremnitzer, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 09/24/1997
    Petition for Writ of Mandamus Enforcing the Lead Plaintiff Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
    Case Name and/or Number: Weaver, et al., v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Other Date on the document: 12/08/1997
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-1377
    Case Name and/or Number: Strauss, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 12/09/1997
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Strauss, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Other Date on the document: 12/09/1997
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-1409
    Case Name and/or Number: Gitlin, et al v. Informix Corporation, et al
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 12/10/1997
    CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 97-CV-1434