Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


Prism Solutions, Inc. (acquired by Ardent Software)
Conclusion: According to the closing Order, dated 4/16/1998 from U.S. District Judge Fern M. Smith of the United States District Court for the District of Northern California, the case was dismissed without prejudice. All parties shall bear their own costs, expenses, attorneys' and other fees in connection with this action.

The original complaint charges Prism and certain of its officers, directors and underwriters of its initial public offering with violations of the California Corporations and Civil Codes and the federal Securities Act of 1933. Prior to and during the Class Period, defendants artificially inflated the demand for Prism common stock so they could issue 2,170,000 shares at $17 per share on March 14, 1996, and further inflated the stock price to as high as $36-3/4 in May 1996, before the true adverse facts known to them concerning Prism's business and prospects slowly began to be revealed, causing Prism's stock price to plunge to as low as $4-1/4 following the end of the Class Period.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7372
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: Ardent Software
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: ARDT
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.ardentsoftware.com/

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
David L. Stein, et al. v. Prism Solutions, Inc., et al.
 COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 97-CV-4682
 JUDGE NAME: Hon. Fern M. Smith
 DATE FILED: 12/24/1997  SOURCE: Internet
 CLASS PERIOD START: 03/14/1996  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/14/1996
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Unamended/Unconsolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • James V. Bashian
      500 Fifth Ave Ste 2800, New York, NY, 10110
       (voice) , (fax) ,
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (San Diego, CA)
      600 West Broadway, 1800 One America Plaza, San Diego, CA, 92101
       (voice) 800.449.4900, (fax) , support@milberg.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Securities Act of 1933
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 12/24/1997
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 04/21/1998
    Litigants
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/13/1998
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 10/13/1999

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    [Corrected] First Amended Class Action Complaint for Damages Based Upon Violations of Cal. Corp. Code §§25400/25500 and Violations of the Securities Act of 1933
    Case Name and/or Number: Adler, et al. v. Prism Solutions, Inc., et al
    Type: Other Date on the document: 03/05/1997
    Order Sustaining the Demurrers of the Prism Defendants and the Underwriter Defendants to Plaintiffs' Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Adler, et al. v. Prism Solutions, Inc., et al
    Type: Order Date on the document: 08/07/1997
    Notice Of Proposed Settlement Of Class Action
    Case Name and/or Number: Adler, et al. v. Prism Solutions, Inc., et al.
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 06/11/2002

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top