 |
||
|
|
Home Annual/Quarterly
Updates About
Us
|
MTI Technology Corporation Conclusion: According to a court docket, the court dismissed the case with a $900,000 class settlement on November 30, 1999.
According to a Press Release dated 8/31/98, the action charges that MTI Technology issued materially false and misleading statements during the Class Period about the results for its 1998 fiscal first quarter. In particular, it is charged that, on May 21, 1998, MTI's senior officers, in a conference call with stock market analysts, misrepresented the continuing negative impact sales from Europe were having on first quarter results and failed to inform investors of the continuing delay in its Gladiator Enterprise 3600 Fibre Channel Storage System.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 3572
Sector: Technology
Industry: Computer Storage Devices
ock
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | MTI Technology Corporation |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | MTIC |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.mti.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Xin, et al. v. MTI Technology Corporation, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Class Action Complaint | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 08/26/1998 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 06/10/1999 | ||
|
REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| In re MTI Technology Corporation Securities Litigation | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 07/26/2000 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top