 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Digital Link Corporation Conclusion: According to the docket dated August 28, 2000, on November 10, 1997, the plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint. A Stipulation of Settlement was filed on May 10, 2000. Judge Ronald M. Whyte preliminarily approved the settlement on May 17, 2000. On August 9, 2000, the Court entered the Final Judgment dismissing the action with prejudice as well as the Orders granting the approval of the plan of allocation and awarding counsel’s fees and expenses.
On September 11, 1997, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss. The Court granted plaintiff leave to file, and plaintiff has filed, an amended complaint. The Company has moved to dismiss the amended complaint. There has been no discovery in the federal action, and no trial date has been set.
The complaint charges Digital Link and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the federal securities laws. Digital Link manufactures and markets high speed digital access products for wide area networks ("WANs"), purchased mostly by telephone companies. This action complains of a scheme and course of business that operated as a fraud or deceit on purchasers of Digital Link stock during the Class Period. Plaintiff alleges that defendants made false and misleading statements about the development of Digital Link's W/ATM GateWay and PremisWay products, the strong international and domestic demand for and market acceptance of its products, and Digital Link's prospects for earnings growth.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 4899
Sector: Services
Industry: Communications Services
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Digital Link Corporation |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | DLNK |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.dl.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| George Genna, et al. v. Digital Link Corporation, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| George Genna, et al. v. Digital Link Corporation, et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Complaint based upon self dealing and breach of fiduciary duty (.pdf file) | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Andrew Curtis Wright et al v. Digital Link Corporation et al | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 03/23/2000 | ||
| Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty (.pdf file) | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Levy et al v. Digital Link Corporation et al | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 03/23/2000 | ||
| Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty (.pdf file) | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Levy et al v. Digital Link Corporation et al | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 03/23/2000 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top