[Web note: Page formatting approximates, but does not match exactly, that of filed paper document.]

STEVEN M. SCHATZ, State Bar # 118356
TIMOTHY T. SCOTT, State Bar # 126971
THOMAS J. MARTIN, State Bar # 150039
DANIEL W. TURBOW, State Bar # 175015
WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California  94304-1050
Telephone:  (415) 493-9300

Attorneys for Defendants 



                  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

                        SAN JOSE DIVISION


GEORGE GENNA, On Behalf of Himself ) CASE NO.: C-96-20867-RMW (EAI)
and All Others Similarly Situated, )
                                   ) DEFENDANTS' STATEMENT OF
          Plaintiff,               ) NON-OPPOSITION TO
                                   ) PLAINTIFF GEORGE GENNA'S
     v.                            ) MOTION TO BE APPOINTED LEAD
                                   ) PLAINTIFF AND FOR APPROVAL
DIGITAL LINK CORPORATION, VINITA   ) OF LEAD COUNSEL
GUPTA, DANIEL L. PALMER, TIMOTHY   )
K. MONTGOMERY, STANLEY E.          ) Date:  February 21, 1997
KAZMIERCZAK, TONI BELLIN,          ) Time:  9:00 a.m.
BENJAMIN W. BERRY, MOREY R.        ) Dept:  The Honorable
SCHAPIRA, GREGORY M. AVIS and      )        Ronald M. Whyte
CHARLES R. MOORE,                  )
                                   )
          Defendants.              )
___________________________________)



DEFT'S STATEMENT OF NON-OPP TO PLTF
GEORGE GENNA'S MOT TO BE APPOINTED LEAD
PLTF AND FOR APPROVAL OF LEAD COUNSEL




     Defendants hereby state their non-opposition to plaintiff 

George Genna's motion to be appointed lead plaintiff and for 

approval of lead counsel.  To the best of  defendants' knowledge, 

Mr. Genna and his counsel are the only plaintiffs to have expressed 

any inclination to pursue this action.  Nonetheless, defendants 

specifically reserve their rights to object at an appropriate time 

to plaintiff's claims that a) plaintiff can adequately represent 

the class of which he claims to be a member and b) the class 

plaintiff purports to represent can be certified.  These 

objections will be asserted when, if ever, plaintiff moves for 

certification of the class.



Dated: January 31, 1997            WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI


                                   By: ____________________________
                                          Timothy T. Scott
                                   Attorneys for Defendants





DEFT'S STATEMENT OF NON-OPP TO PLTF
GEORGE GENNA'S MOT TO BE APPOINTED LEAD
PLTF AND FOR APPROVAL OF LEAD COUNSEL      -2-