|
|
|||
[Web note: Page formatting approximates, but does not match exactly, that of filed paper document.]
STEVEN M. SCHATZ, State Bar # 118356 TIMOTHY T. SCOTT, State Bar # 126971 THOMAS J. MARTIN, State Bar # 150039 DANIEL W. TURBOW, State Bar # 175015 WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1050 Telephone: (415) 493-9300 Attorneys for Defendants VINITA GUPTA, DANIEL L. PALMER, TIMOTHY K. MONTGOMERY, STANLEY E. KAZMIERCZAK, TONI BELLIN, BENJAMIN W. BERRY, MOREY R. SCHAPIRA, GREGORY M. AVIS, CHARLES R. MOORE and DIGITAL LINK CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GEORGE GENNA, On Behalf of Himself ) CASE NO.: C-96-20867-RMW (EAI) and All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, ) ) DECLARATION OF DANIEL W. v. ) TURBOW IN SUPPORT OF ) DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DIGITAL LINK CORPORATION, VINITA ) DISMISS GUPTA, DANIEL L. PALMER, TIMOTHY ) K. MONTGOMERY, STANLEY E. ) Date: February 21, 1997 KAZMIERCZAK, TONI BELLIN, ) Time: 9:00 a.m. BENJAMIN W. BERRY, MOREY R. ) Judge: The Honorable Ronald SCHAPIRA, GREGORY M. AVIS and ) M. Whyte CHARLES R. MOORE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________) DECLARATION OF DANIEL W. TURBOW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS C-96-20867-RMW (EAI)
I, Daniel W. Turbow, declare: 1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the State of California. I am an associate with the law firm of Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, counsel for defendants. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the Conference Report H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-369, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. 31-32 (1995). 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of Stack v. Lobo, No. 95-20049 SW, 1995 WL 241448 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 1995). 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Wiesel v. Kennedy, No. C95-4472 TEH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 1996). 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of Siegel v. Lyons, No. C-95-3588 DLJ, 1996 WL 634206 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 16, 1996). 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of In re Cirrus Logic Sec. Litig., No. C-93-1591 WHO (N.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 1996). 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of In re Valence Tech. Sec. Litig., No. C 95-20459 JW, 1996 WL 37788 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 1996). 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of In re Sciclone Pharmaceuticals Sec. Litig., No. C-94-1485 SBA (N.D. Cal. March 10, 1995). 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of an amendment proposed by Senator Specter to a bill introduced in the United States Senate, 1485, S. 240, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. (1995). 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of a letter from President Clinton to Congress, H.R. Doc. No. 104- 150, 104th Cong., 1st Sess. (1995). 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of In re Silicon Graphics Inc. Sec. Litig., No. C 96-0393 FMS, 1996 WL 664639 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 1996). 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of Marksman Partners v. Chantal Pharm. Corp., No. CV-96-0872-WJR, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7179 (C.D. Cal. May 21, 1996). DECLARATION OF DANIEL W. TURBOW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS C-96-20867-RMW (EAI) -2-
13. Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of In re 1993 Corning Sec. Litig., No. 93 Civ. 7015 (AGS), 1996 WL 257603 (S.D.N.Y. May 15, 1996). I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed in Palo Alto, California on January 3, 1997. _________________________________ Daniel W. Turbow DECLARATION OF DANIEL W. TURBOW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS C-96-20867-RMW (EAI) -3-