MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
HYNES & LERACH LLP
ALAN SCHULMAN (128661)
MARK SOLOMON (151949)
600 West Broadway, Suite 1800
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619/231-1058
- and -
JOHN K. GRANT (169813)
KIMBERLY C. EPSTEIN (169012)
222 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: 415/288-4545
ABBEY, GARDY & SQUITIERI, LLP
JILL S. ABRAMS
JAMES J. SEIRMARCO (194307)
212 East 39th Street
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: 212/889-3700
BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER &
GROSSMANN LLP
DANIEL L. BERGER
JEFFREY N. LEIBELL
1285 Avenue of the Americas
33rd Floor
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: 212/554-1400
Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
In re DIAMOND MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.
SECURITIES LITIGATION
___________________________________
This Document Relates to:
ALL ACTIONS.
___________________________________
No. C-96-2644-SBA
CLASS ACTION
PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION OF AUTHORITY IN OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS'
AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs respectfully submit the following request for judicial notice and supplemental submission of authority in support of Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Diamond Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint ("Opposition Brief"), filed April 7, 1997.
1. On November 3, 1998, President Clinton signed into law the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 ("Uniform Standards Act"). A copy of H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 105-803 (1998) is attached hereto as Exhibit A and President Clinton's November 3, 1998 Statement concerning the Uniform Standards Act is attached hereto as Exhibit B. As these documents show, the legislative history of the Uniform Standards Act directly addresses the pleading standards under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-67, 109 Stat. 737 (1995), relating to scienter.(1) See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 105-803, at 15 (1998), Exhibit A; Statement By The President at 2, Exhibit B.
2. On November 17, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") submitted its supplemental memorandum as amicus curiae in the appeal pending before the Ninth Circuit in In re Silicon Graphics Sec. Litig., No. 97-16240. A copy of the SEC's supplemental memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit C.(2) The supplemental authorities supplied at Exhibits A, B and C support the argument presented in plaintiffs' Opposition Brief at 10-18.
DATED: January 22, 1999
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
HYNES & LERACH LLP
ALAN SCHULMAN
MARK SOLOMON
600 West Broadway, Suite 1800
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619/231-1058
MILBERG WEISS BERSHAD
HYNES & LERACH LLP
JOHN K. GRANT
KIMBERLY C. EPSTEIN
______________________________
JOHN K. GRANT
222 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: 415/288-4545
ABBEY, GARDY & SQUITIERI, LLP
JILL S. ABRAMS
JAMES J. SEIRMARCO
212 East 39th Street
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: 212/889-3700
BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER &
GROSSMANN LLP
DANIEL L. BERGER
JEFFREY N. LEIBELL
1285 Avenue of the Americas
33rd Floor
New York, NY 10019
Telephone: 212/554-1400
Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs and the Class
DIAMOND\DRD02173.MIS
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL
PURSUANT TO NORTHERN DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 23-2(c)(2)
I, the undersigned, declare:
1. That declarant is and was, at all times herein mentioned, a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of San Francisco, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to or interested in the within action; that declarant's business address is 222 Kearny Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, California 94108.
2. That on January 22, 1999, declarant served the PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE AND SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSION OF AUTHORITY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by depositing a true copy thereof in a United States mailbox at San Francisco, California in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid and addressed to the parties listed on the attached Service List and that this document was forwarded to the following designated Internet site at:
http://securities.milberg.com
3. That there is a regular communication by mail between the place of mailing and the places so addressed.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 22nd day of January, 1999, at San Francisco, California.
______________________________
JANETTE M. INGRAM
1. The Court may take judicial notice and consider the language and legislative history of a statute. Shamrock Farms Co. v. Veneman, NO. CIV. S-96-889 LKK, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20653, at *12 n.3 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 1996), aff'd, 146 F.3d 1177 (9th Cir. 1998); MGIC Indem. Corp. v. Weisman, 803 F.2d 500, 504 (9th Cir. 1986).
2. As the agency charged with administering and enforcing the federal securities laws, the SEC's views are entitled to considerable weight. Saxbe v. Bustos, 419 U.S. 65, 74 (1974). This Court may freely notice documents filed in other court proceedings. Duckett v. Godinez, 67 F.3d 734, 741 (9th Cir. 1995); Hendrix v. Naphtal, 971 F.2d 398, 401 n.5 (9th Cir. 1992); Bryant v. Carleson, 444 F.2d 353, 357-58 (9th Cir. 1971). Courts have noted the contents of amicus briefs submitted to the Supreme Court while analyzing issues in the cases before them. See United States v. Stewart, 650 F.2d 178, 179 (9th Cir. 1981); United States v. Fishman, 743 F. Supp. 713, 718 (N.D. Cal. 1990).