 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Cor Therapeutics, Inc. Conclusion: According to the docket posted and the Company's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 1998, plaintiff and the defendant have agreed that plaintiff will voluntarily dismiss all claims against all defendants in that action. On May 18, 1998, the Stipulation and Order by Judge Ronald M. Whyte dismissed the case.
The complaint charges Cor and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Specifically, the complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants caused Cor to disseminate, through public statements and SEC filings, false and misleading statements about the results of the clinical trials for its drug Integrilin for use in patients with unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The complaint further alleges that defendants engaged in this wrongful conduct for the purpose of allowing the Company to raise more than $59 million in proceeds by completing a public offering of Cor common stock at artificially inflated prices.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 2834
Sector: Healthcare
Industry: Biotechnology & Drugs
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Cor Therapeutics, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | CORR |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.corr.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Robert Leff, et al. v. Cor Therapeutics, Inc., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Class Action Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 01/30/1998 | ||
| CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 98-CV-20104 | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 06/05/1998 | ||
| Party and Counsel List | |||
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 06/05/1998 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: | |||
| Type: | Date on the document: | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top