 | ||
|
| Home Annual/Quarterly Updates About Us
|
Grand Casinos, Inc. Conclusion: According to the docket posted, on May 4, 2001, the Court entered the Order granting the motion for preliminary approval of the settlement and certification of the class. That same day, the Court entered the Summary of Notice of Class Action, Proposed Settlement, and Settlement Hearing. The proposed Settlement of the litigation was in the amount of $9,000,000. On August 17, 2001, the Court entered the Final Judgment by John R. Tunheim. The Court approved the settlement set forth in the settlement agreement and the case was terminated.
Earlier, on March 30, 2000, the Court entered the Memorandum, Opinion, and Order granting in part and denying in part the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The defendants' motion was granted with regard to the members of plaintiffs' putative class who did not purchase Grand common stock during the period from December 19, 1995 through June 6, 1996, inclusive, and their claims were dismissed with prejudice. The defendants’ motion was denied in all other respects.
In December 1997, the court granted the Company's motion to dismiss in part, and denied the motion in part. Thus, the plaintiffs pursued the claims in the consolidated complaint that survived the Company's motion to dismiss.
In re Grand Casinos, Inc. Securities Litigation was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. The action constitutes a consolidation of two previously filed complaints initiated by individual shareholders. The consolidated complaint purports to seek relief on behalf of two classes of plaintiffs. The first class consists of individuals who purchased common stock of the Company during the period from December 19, 1995 through July 22, 1996. The second class consists of individuals who purchased common stock of the Company during the period from February 14, 1996 through February 22, 1996. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Federal securities laws by making misrepresentations and engaging in proscribed trading activity.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7011
Sector: Services
Industry: Hotels & Motels
| COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: | Grand Casinos, Inc. |
| COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: | GND |
| COMPANY WEBSITE: | http://www.grandcasinos.com |
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE | |||||||||||||||||
| Blake, et al. v. Grand Casinos, Inc., et al. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT | |||
| Type: | Date on the document: | ||
| REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||||||||||||||||
| In re Grand Casinos, Inc. Securities Litigation | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT | |||
| Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 12/23/1996 | ||
| Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 04/22/1998 | ||
| Summary Notice Of Class Action, Proposed Settlement, And Settlement Hearing | |||
| Type: Notice | Date on the document: 05/02/2001 | ||
| U.S. District Court Civil Docket | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 12/10/2002 | ||
| OTHER DOCUMENTS | |||
| Class Action Complaint for Violation of N.R.S §§90.570 and 90.660, §§11 and 15 of the Securities Act | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Opitz, et al. v. Stupak, et al. | |||
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 08/16/1996 | ||
| Docket | |||
| Case Name and/or Number: Marcus , et al. Grand Casinos, Inc., et al. | |||
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 04/07/1997 | ||
WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top