Cendant Corporation - Securities Class Action

Company and Case Information

IMPORTANT INFORMATION | INDEX OF FILINGS | SEARCH

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors

Register

_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School

Cendant Corporation Conclusion: The original securities class action complaint alleges that Cendant (and its predecessor corporation, CUC International Inc.) and three of its officers violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by publishing false and misleading financial statements and by overstating its income by over $100 million. TD Plaintiffs allege that the market price of Cendant stock was artificially inflated during the Class Period as a result of the misrepresentations.

As summarized by the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, since our April 15, 1998 announcement of the discovery of accounting irregularities in the former CUC business units, and prior to the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, approximately 70 lawsuits claiming to be class actions, two lawsuits claiming to be brought derivatively on our behalf and several other lawsuits and arbitration proceedings have been filed in various courts against us and other defendants.

In re: Cendant Corporation Litigation, Master File No. 98-1664 (WHW) (D.N.J.) (the "Securities Action"), is a consolidated action consisting of over sixty constituent class action lawsuits, that were originally filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the District of Connecticut, and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The Securities Action is brought on behalf of all persons who acquired securities of the Company and CUC, except our PRIDES securities, between May 31, 1995 and August 28, 1998. The Court granted the lead plaintiffs' unopposed motion for class certification on January 27, 1999. Named as defendants are the Company; twenty-eight current and former officers and directors of the Company, CUC and HFS; and Ernst & Young LLP ("Ernst & Young"), CUC's former independent accounting firm.

The Amended and Consolidated Class Action Complaint in the Securities Action alleges that, among other things, the lead plaintiffs and members of the class were damaged when they acquired securities of the Company and CUC because, as a result of accounting irregularities, the Company's and CUC's previously issued financial statements were materially false and misleading, and the allegedly false and misleading financial statements caused the prices of the Company's and CUC's securities to be inflated artificially. The Amended and Consolidated Complaint alleges violations of Sections 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and Sections 10(b), 14(a), 20(a), and 20A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"). Lead plaintiffs in the Securities Action seek damages for themselves in unspecified amounts.

On December 14, 1998, the lead plaintiffs in the Securities Action moved for partial summary judgment, on liability only, against the Company on the claims under Section 11 of the Securities Act. The lead plaintiffs adjourned this motion, however, without prejudice to their right to re-notice the motion at a subsequent time.

On January 25, 1999, the Company answered the Amended Consolidated Complaint and asserted Cross-Claims against Ernst & Young. The Company's Cross-Claims allege that Ernst & Young failed to follow professional standards to discover, and recklessly disregarded, the accounting irregularities, and is therefore liable to the Company for damages in unspecified amounts. The Cross-Claims assert claims for breaches of Ernst & Young's audit agreements with the Company, negligence, breaches of fiduciary duty, fraud, and contribution.

On March 26, 1999, Ernst & Young filed Cross-Claims against the Company and certain of the Company's present and former officers and directors, alleging that any failure to discover the accounting irregularities was caused by misrepresentations and omissions made to Ernst & Young in the course of its audits and other reviews of the Company's financial statements. Ernst & Young's Cross-Claims assert claims for breach of contract, fraud, fraudulent inducement, negligent misrepresentation and contribution. Damages in unspecified amounts are sought for the costs to Ernst & Young associated with defending the various shareholder lawsuits and for harm to Ernst & Young's reputation.

On December 7, 1999, the Company announced that it had reached a preliminary agreement to settle the Securities Action.

According to the Notice of Settlement of Class Action dated April 7, 2000, the Settlements will create a settlement fund (the “Settlement Fund”) that totals $3,186,500,000 in cash plus interest. The settlement with Cendant and the HFS Individual Defendants (the “Cendant Settlement”) includes a payment for the Class of $2,851,500,000 in cash, and the settlement with E&Y (the “E&Y Settlement”) includes a payment for the Class of $335,000,000 in cash. A settlement hearing will be held to determine if the settlement should be approved.

On August 15, 2000, Judge William H. Walls approved the settlement with Cendant and certain Individual Defendants. Judge Walls also approved the settlement between the lead plaintiffs and Ernst & Young LLP. The Plan of Allocation was approved and the Court also granted the award of attorneys’ fees and expenses. According to the August 16, 2000 Order, the requested fee of $262,468,857 is awarded and expenses in the amount of $14,623,806 are allowed.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7200
Sector: Services
Industry: Hotels & Motels

COMPANY/ISSUER NAME:	Cendant Corporation
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER:	CD
COMPANY WEBSITE:	http://www.cendant.com

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE

Lester A. Goldstein, et al. v. Cendant Corporation, et al.

COURT: D. New Jersey	DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-1664
JUDGE NAME: Hon. William H. Walls
DATE FILED: 04/16/1998	SOURCE: Internet
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/28/1997	CLASS PERIOD END: 04/15/1998
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Complaint (Unamended and Unconsolidated)
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo (MA) One Liberty Square, Boston, MA, 2109 (voice) 617.542.8300, (fax) 617.230.0903, info@bermanesq.com Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (former San Diego) 12544 High Bluff Drive, Suite 150, San Diego, CA, 92130 (voice) 858.793.0070, (fax) 858.793.0323, blbg@blbglaw.com Chimicles, Jacobsen & Tikellis One Rodney Square, Fifth Floor, Wilmington Sq, DE, 19899 (voice) 302.656.2500, (fax) , Kaufman Malchman Kirby & Squire, LLP 919 Third Ave 11th Flr, New York, NY, 10022 (voice) 212.371.6600, (fax) , Pomerantz Haudek Block Grossman & Gross LLP (New York) 100 Park Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY, 10017-5516 (voice) 212.661.1100, (fax) 212.661.8665, info@pomerantzlaw.com/ Rabin & Peckel LLP 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor, New York, NY, 10016 (voice) 212.682.1818, (fax) 212.682.1892, email@rabinlaw.com Savett Frutkin Podell & Ryan, P.C. , Philadelphia, PA, (voice) 800.993.3233, (fax) , sfprpc@op.net Wolf Popper, LLP 845 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022-6689 (voice) 877.370.7703, (fax) 212.486.2093, IRRep@wolfpopper.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 8

DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
Class Action Complaint For Violations Of Federal Securities Laws
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 04/16/1998
Order Consolidating Actions
Type: Order of Consolidation		Date on the document: 05/29/1998
Notice of Motion
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 06/15/1998
Minutes of Proceedings
Type: Order Appointing LP/LC		Date on the document: 08/04/1998
Declaration of John C. Coffee, Jr.
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 08/17/1998
Minutes of Proceedings
Type: Order Dismissing LP/LC (Drop)		Date on the document: 08/24/1998
Opinion [re lead plaintiff, lead counsel, and lead liason appointments]
Type: Other		Date on the document: 09/08/1998
Order
Type: Order Appointing LP/LC		Date on the document: 09/08/1998
Order
Type: Order Appointing LP/LC		Date on the document: 10/09/1998
Order
Type: Order Appointing LP/LC		Date on the document: 10/13/1998
Order De-Consolidating Certain Actions
Type: Order		Date on the document: 11/30/1998
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 05/28/1999

REFERENCE COMPLAINT

In Re: Cendant Corporation Litigation

COURT: D. New Jersey	DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-1664
JUDGE NAME:
DATE FILED: 12/14/1998	SOURCE: Other
CLASS PERIOD START: 05/31/1995	CLASS PERIOD END: 08/28/1998
TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Consolidated
PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
Barrack Rodos & Bacine (former Haddonfield , NJ) 14 Kings Highway West, Haddonfield, NJ, 08033 (voice) 856.354.070, (fax) , Barrack, Rodos & Bacine (Main office, Philadelphia) Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Suite 3300 , Philadelphia, PA, 19103 (voice) 215.963.0600, (fax) 215.963.0838, info@barrack.com Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (New York, NY) 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor, New York, NY, 10019 (voice) 212.554.1400, (fax) 212.554.1444, blbg@blbglaw.com Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP (Westfield, NJ) 220 St. Paul Street, Westfield, NJ, 07090 (voice) 908.928.1700, (fax) 908.301.9008, blbg@blbglaw.com _____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 4

DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
Amended And Consolidated Class Action Complaint
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 12/14/1998
Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/27/1999
Plaintiffs' Motion For Approval Of Notice Of Pendency Of Class Action And Summary Notice Of Pendency Of Class Action, And For Entry Of Order Concerning Notice Of Pendency Of Class Action
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 06/23/1999
Opinion
Type: Other		Date on the document: 07/27/1999
Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 07/27/1999
Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 08/06/1999
Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 12/13/1999
First Amended Complaint
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 12/15/1999
Notice Of Settlement Of Class Action
Type: Notice		Date on the document: 04/07/2000
Proof Of Claim And Release
Type: Other		Date on the document: 04/07/2000
Motion For Approval Of Proposed Settlement Of Class Action And Plan Of Allocation Of Net Settlement Fund
Type: Motion		Date on the document: 05/05/2000
Judgment Approving Settlement And Dismissing Action As Against Cendant Corporation And Certain Other Defendants
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Judgment Approving Settlement And Dismissing Action Between Lead Plaintiffs And Ernst & Young LLP
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Opinion
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Opinion
Type: Other		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Order
Type: Order		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Order Approving Lead Plaintiffs' Plan Of Allocation Of Net Settlement Fund
Type: Order		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Stipulation Of Settlement With Cendant Corporation And Certain Other Defendants
Type: Settlement		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Stipulation Of Settlement With Ernst & Young LLP
Type: Settlement		Date on the document: 08/15/2000
Order
Type: Order Approving AF&E		Date on the document: 08/16/2000
Declaration of Elliott J. Weiss
Type: Declaration		Date on the document: 08/24/2000
Notice Of Appeal
Type: Notice of Appeal		Date on the document: 08/25/2000
Notice Of Appeal
Type: Notice of Appeal		Date on the document: 09/11/2000
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 06/09/2004
Order of Dismissal
Type: Order		Date on the document: 01/29/2008
U.S. District Court Civil Docket
Type: Docket		Date on the document: 11/09/2010

OTHER DOCUMENTS
Class Action Complaint
Case Name and/or Number: Steinberg, et al. v. Cendant Corporation, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 04/24/1998
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion of California Public Employees' Retirement System, New
Case Name and/or Number: Steinberg v. Shelton, et al.
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/12/1998
Motion of California Public Employee's Retirement System, New York State Common Retirement Fund
Case Name and/or Number: Steinberg, et al. v. Cendant Corporation, et al.
Type: Other		Date on the document: 06/12/1998
Class Action Complaint For Violations Of Federal Securities And Laws
Case Name and/or Number: P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC, et al. v. Cendant Corporation, et al.
Type: Complaint		Date on the document: 10/14/1998

WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.

Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top

�