| |
CBT Group, PLC : American Depositary Shares
Conclusion: According to closing Order, dated February 27, 2004, from U.S. Distric Judge Ronald M. Whyte of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the case was dismissed with prejudice.
In a Press Release dated December 1, 2003, SkillSoft PLC, formerly CBT Group, PLC, announced that it has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit filed against the
Company, one of its subsidiaries and certain of its former and current officers
and directors in 1998. Under the terms of the settlement, the Company
will make a $10 million cash payment within 30 days and an additional $6
million payment in mid-2004. The Company's insurance carriers will pay an
additional $16 million for total settlement payments of $32 million.
According to a Form 10-K, at the end of its fiscal third quarter of 1998, several purported class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against CBT Group, one of its subsidiaries and certain members of its former and current officers and directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws. It has been alleged in these lawsuits that the company misrepresented or omitted to state material facts regarding business and financial condition and prospects in order to artificially inflate and maintain the price of its ADSs, and misrepresented or omitted to state material facts in its registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with its merger with ForeFront, which also is alleged to have artificially inflated the price of the company's ADSs.
The original complaint alleged that defendats violated federal securities laws by making misrepresentations about CBT Group's business, earnings growth and financial statements and its ability to continue to achieve profitable growth.
INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7372
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming
| FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE |
| King v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| COURT: N.D. California | DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-21014 |
| JUDGE NAME: Judge Ronald M. Whyte |
| DATE FILED: 10/02/1998 | SOURCE: Complaint | | CLASS PERIOD START: 04/14/1998 | CLASS PERIOD END: 10/02/1998 | | TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Consolidated | | PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE: |
Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP 595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94105-2835sco
(voice) 800.778.1822, (fax) 415.777.5189, info@gbcsf.com
_____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 1 | | REFERENCE COMPLAINT | | In Re CBT Group, PLC, Securities Litigation | | COURT: N.D. California | DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-21014 | | JUDGE NAME: Ronald M. Whyte | | DATE FILED: 02/05/2001 | SOURCE: Internet | | CLASS PERIOD START: 01/20/1998 | CLASS PERIOD END: 10/01/1998 | | TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Second Amended and Consolidated | | PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT: |
Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP 595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94105-2835sco
(voice) 800.778.1822, (fax) 415.777.5189, info@gbcsf.com
Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (S.F., CA) 100 Pine Street - Suite 2600, San Francisco, CA, 94111
(voice) 415.288.4545, (fax) 415.288.4534,
_____________________________________________ TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS: 2 | | | OTHER DOCUMENTS | | Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| Case Name and/or Number: Anderson, et al. v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 10/02/1998 | | Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws |
| Case Name and/or Number: Farwell v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 10/16/1998 | | Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| Case Name and/or Number: Richter v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 10/30/1998 | | Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
| Case Name and/or Number: Gott v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 11/17/1998 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: DeConti v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 12/03/1998 | | Litigants |
| Case Name and/or Number: DeConti v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 12/03/1998 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Gott v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 12/31/1998 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Hall v. Buckley, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 01/13/1999 | | Litigants |
| Case Name and/or Number: Hall v. Buckley, et al. |
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 01/13/1999 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Richter v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 01/19/1999 | | Litigants |
| Case Name and/or Number: Richter v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 01/19/1999 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Farwell v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 01/21/1999 | | Litigants |
| Case Name and/or Number: Farwell v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 01/21/1999 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Anderson, et al. v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 01/25/1999 | | Litigants |
| Case Name and/or Number: Anderson, et al. v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 01/25/1999 | | Class Action Complaint |
| Case Name and/or Number: Leon v. CBT Group PLC, et al. |
| Type: Complaint | Date on the document: 02/18/1999 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Fein v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 02/26/1999 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Leon v. CBT Group PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 03/31/1999 | | Docket |
| Case Name and/or Number: Sethi v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Docket | Date on the document: 11/08/1999 | | Litigants |
| Case Name and/or Number: Sethi v. CBT Group, PLC, et al. |
| Type: Other | Date on the document: 11/08/1999 | WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY: The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful. Go to Search page | Go to Case Index page | Back to Top
|