Company and Case Information

Home

Index of Filings

News and Press Releases

Filings

Decisions

Settlements

Litigation Activity Indices

Top Ten List

Annual/Quarterly Updates

Clearinghouse Research

Articles & Papers

Search

Related Sites

About Us

Local Rules

Sponsors


Register


_______________
Copyright (c) 2001
Stanford Law School


CBT Group, PLC : American Depositary Shares
Conclusion: According to closing Order, dated February 27, 2004, from U.S. Distric Judge Ronald M. Whyte of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, the case was dismissed with prejudice.

In a Press Release dated December 1, 2003, SkillSoft PLC, formerly CBT Group, PLC, announced that it has agreed to settle the class action lawsuit filed against the Company, one of its subsidiaries and certain of its former and current officers and directors in 1998. Under the terms of the settlement, the Company will make a $10 million cash payment within 30 days and an additional $6 million payment in mid-2004. The Company's insurance carriers will pay an additional $16 million for total settlement payments of $32 million.

According to a Form 10-K, at the end of its fiscal third quarter of 1998, several purported class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California against CBT Group, one of its subsidiaries and certain members of its former and current officers and directors alleging violations of the federal securities laws. It has been alleged in these lawsuits that the company misrepresented or omitted to state material facts regarding business and financial condition and prospects in order to artificially inflate and maintain the price of its ADSs, and misrepresented or omitted to state material facts in its registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with its merger with ForeFront, which also is alleged to have artificially inflated the price of the company's ADSs.

The original complaint alleged that defendats violated federal securities laws by making misrepresentations about CBT Group's business, earnings growth and financial statements and its ability to continue to achieve profitable growth.

INDUSTRY CLASSIFICATION:
SIC Code: 7372
Sector: Technology
Industry: Software & Programming


COMPANY/ISSUER NAME: CBT Group, PLC
COMPANY/ISSUER TICKER: CBTSY
COMPANY WEBSITE: http://www.cbtsys.ie/cbt_group/cbt_group.html#

FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT IN THE DATABASE
King v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
 COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-21014
 JUDGE NAME: Judge Ronald M. Whyte
 DATE FILED: 10/02/1998  SOURCE: Complaint
 CLASS PERIOD START: 04/14/1998  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/02/1998
 TYPE OF COMPLAINT: First Consolidated
 PLAINTIFF FIRMS IN THIS OR SIMILAR CASE:
  • Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP
      595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94105-2835sco
       (voice) 800.778.1822, (fax) 415.777.5189, info@gbcsf.com
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  1

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE FIRST IDENTIFIED COMPLAINT
    First Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/20/1998
    Proof of Service
    Type: Other Date on the document: 12/15/1998
    Supplemental Declaration Of Joseph M. Barton In Support Of Motion For Appointment Of The King Group As Lead Plaintiffs, Approval Of Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel And Consolidation Of All Related Actions
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 12/15/1998
    The King Group's Supplemental Submission Of Additional Plaintiffs Joining In The Motion For Appointment Of The King Group As Lead Plaintiffs, Approval Of Lead Plaintiffs' Counsel And Consolidation Of All Related Actions
    Type: Other Date on the document: 12/15/1998
    Order Re: Appointment of Lead Counsel
    Type: Order Date on the document: 01/28/1999
    Order Appointing Lead Plaintiff and Co-Lead Counsel
    Type: Order Date on the document: 02/16/1999
    Order Consolidating All Related Actions
    Type: Order Date on the document: 02/16/1999

    REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    In Re CBT Group, PLC, Securities Litigation
     COURT: N.D. California  DOCKET NUMBER: 98-CV-21014
     JUDGE NAME: Ronald M. Whyte
     DATE FILED: 02/05/2001  SOURCE: Internet
     CLASS PERIOD START: 01/20/1998  CLASS PERIOD END: 10/01/1998
     TYPE OF COMPLAINT: Second Amended and Consolidated
     PLAINTIFF FIRMS NAMED IN COMPLAINT:
  • Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP
      595 Market Street, Suite 2300, San Francisco, CA, 94105-2835sco
       (voice) 800.778.1822, (fax) 415.777.5189, info@gbcsf.com
  • Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach LLP (S.F., CA)
      100 Pine Street - Suite 2600, San Francisco, CA, 94111
       (voice) 415.288.4545, (fax) 415.288.4534,
    _____________________________________________
     TOTAL NUMBER OF PLAINTIFF FIRMS:  2

  •  DOCUMENTS FOR THE REFERENCE COMPLAINT
    Consolidated Amended Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws [Corrected Copy]
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 03/29/1999
    Appendix of Unpublished Authorities in Support of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Other Date on the document: 05/03/1999
    Certificate of Service
    Type: Other Date on the document: 05/03/1999
    Declaration of Ignacio E. Salceda in Support of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 05/03/1999
    Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 05/03/1999
    Notice of Motion and Motion To Dismiss and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 05/03/1999
    Statement of Non-Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification
    Type: Other Date on the document: 06/18/1999
    Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Counter-Motion To Strike Certain Documents Offered as Evidence to
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/02/1999
    Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/02/1999
    Supplemental Appendix of Unpublished Authorities in Support of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Other Date on the document: 07/02/1999
    [Proposed] Order Granting Defendants' Motion To Dismiss Amended Complaint
    Type: Order Date on the document: 07/16/1999
    Order Granting Defendants' Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Order Date on the document: 07/21/1999
    Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification
    Type: Order Date on the document: 07/21/1999
    First Amended Consolidated Complaint [Corrected Copy]
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/04/1999
    Appendix Of Unpublished Authorities In Support Of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss The First Amended Consolidated Complaint
    Type: Other Date on the document: 11/19/1999
    Declaration of Ignacio E. Salceda in Support of Defendants' Motion To Dismiss the First Amended Consolidated Complaint
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 11/19/1999
    Notice Of Motion And Motion To Dismiss The First Amended Consolidated Complaint And Memorandum Of Points And Authorities In Support Of Motion To Dismiss
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 11/19/1999
    Ernst & Young Chartered Accountants’ Motion For Scheduling Order
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 01/18/2002
    Notice Of Proposed Settlement Of Class Action
    Type: Settlement Date on the document: 12/19/2003
    Declaration Of Cheryl Washington Re: (A) Mailing Of Notice Of Proposed Settlement; Proof Of Claim And Release; And (B) Publication Of Summary Notice
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 02/06/2004
    Declaration Of Bjorn Steinholt Re Plan Of Allocation
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 02/17/2004
    Declaration Of Paul F. Bennett In Support Of Application For Attorneys’ Fees And Reimbursement Of Expenses Filed On Behalf Of Gold Bennett Cera & Sidener LLP
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 02/19/2004
    Declaration Of Steven O. Sidener In Support Of Approval Of Proposed Settlement, Approval Of Plan Of Allocation And Award Of Attorneys’ Fee And Reimbursement Of Expenses
    Type: Declaration Date on the document: 02/19/2004
    Motion And Memorandum In Support Of Lead Plaintiffs’ Motion For Award Of Attorneys’ Fees And Reimbursement Of Expenses
    Type: Motion Date on the document: 02/19/2004
    Notice Of Motion And Motion For Final Approval Of Settlement And For Approval Of Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds
    Type: Notice Date on the document: 02/19/2004
    Proof Of Service
    Type: Other Date on the document: 02/19/2004
    [Proposed] Final Judgment And Order Of Dismissal With Prejudice
    Type: Order Date on the document: 02/27/2004
    [Proposed] Findings On And Order Approving Plan Of Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds
    Type: Order Date on the document: 02/27/2004
    [Proposed] Findings On And Order Awarding Attorneys’ Fees And Reimbursement Of Expenses
    Type: Order Date on the document: 02/27/2004
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 03/26/2004
    U.S. District Court Civil Docket
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 07/23/2004

     OTHER DOCUMENTS
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Anderson, et al. v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/02/1998
    Complaint for Violations of the Federal Securities Laws
    Case Name and/or Number: Farwell v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/16/1998
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Richter v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 10/30/1998
    Complaint for Violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
    Case Name and/or Number: Gott v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 11/17/1998
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: DeConti v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 12/03/1998
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: DeConti v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Other Date on the document: 12/03/1998
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Gott v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 12/31/1998
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Hall v. Buckley, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 01/13/1999
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Hall v. Buckley, et al.
    Type: Other Date on the document: 01/13/1999
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Richter v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 01/19/1999
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Richter v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Other Date on the document: 01/19/1999
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Farwell v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 01/21/1999
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Farwell v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Other Date on the document: 01/21/1999
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Anderson, et al. v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 01/25/1999
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Anderson, et al. v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 01/25/1999
    Class Action Complaint
    Case Name and/or Number: Leon v. CBT Group PLC, et al.
    Type: Complaint Date on the document: 02/18/1999
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Fein v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 02/26/1999
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Leon v. CBT Group PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 03/31/1999
    Docket
    Case Name and/or Number: Sethi v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Docket Date on the document: 11/08/1999
    Litigants
    Case Name and/or Number: Sethi v. CBT Group, PLC, et al.
    Type: Other Date on the document: 11/08/1999

    WARNING AND DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY:
    The information included on this Web site, whether provided by personnel employed by Stanford Law School or by third parties, is provided for research and teaching purposes only. Neither Stanford University, Stanford Law School, nor any of their employees, agents, contractors, or affiliates warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information or analyses displayed herein, and we caution all readers that inclusion of any information on this site does not constitute an endorsement of the truthfulness or accuracy of that information. In particular, this Web site contains complaints and other documents filed in federal and state courts, which make allegations that may or may not be accurate. No reader should, on the basis of information contained in or referenced by this Web site, assume that any of these allegations are truthful.
    Go to Search  page | Go to Case Index  page | Back to Top